To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 957
956  |  958
Subject: 
Re: Genocide and terrorism (Was: SW <-> Russia conspiracy)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Wed, 19 May 1999 02:28:10 GMT
Reply-To: 
lpien@SAYNOTOSPAMctp.iwantnospam.com
Viewed: 
1542 times
  
John DiRienzo wrote:

>    Yes, for me it includes any of the above.  My family is made up of
> productive people, so fortunately I have not been in the position where I
> had to take care of my brother.  I would not loan money to my brother if he
> needed it because of his own irresponsibility.  I would let him suffer the
> consequences of his actions and learn from his mistakes - a far better
> choice than letting him become dependent on me.  I would not coddle him in
> this case or any other.  It is not the same as not caring about him, but it
> is the only way I can show that I care.  If my borther were a different
> creature, like many that roam this planet, he might try to make me feel
> guilt or shame for not "helping" him.  But then I would no longer deal with
> him, because he does not deal with me according to my own rules.  If I ever
> did loan my brother money, it would be because I want to help a person whom
> I respect and like, not merely because he is my because he is my brother and
> somehow has a right to my money.  I draw the line where ever I choose.  I
> will help (usually money because I have more of it than time) people I
> respect - I respect those who respect me and my beliefs.

Right on. I have a brother in law who has exhibited enough cluelessness
and consequence avoidance that he's on the verge of being written off.

>   Name one thing we are entitled to.  We HAVE rights, but that is different
> from entitlements.  Where in the Constitution does it say we are entitled to
> welfare, medical insurance, guns?  We may have the right to own guns, but it
> is certainly not the governments responsibility to provide one for everyone!
> Do you follow?

Right on. Key difference here. If you don't get it, re-read. Rights are
about behaviours. Even property rights. There is no RIGHT to goods,
services (property) you have not earned in an honest contract.

Go Objectivist Go!

$ Lar $



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Genocide and terrorism (Was: SW <-> Russia conspiracy)
 
Sproaticus wrote in message <3741DAFA.C11A9695@g...es.com>... (...) else. (...) (assuming (...) Yes, for me it includes any of the above. My family is made up of productive people, so fortunately I have not been in the position where I had to take (...) (27 years ago, 19-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

29 Messages in This Thread:









Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR