Subject:
|
Re: Genocide and terrorism (Was: SW <-> Russia conspiracy)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 19 May 1999 02:28:10 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
lpien@ctp.IWANTNOSPAM.com(antispam)
|
Viewed:
|
574 times
|
| |
|
|
John DiRienzo wrote:
> Yes, for me it includes any of the above. My family is made up of
> productive people, so fortunately I have not been in the position where I
> had to take care of my brother. I would not loan money to my brother if he
> needed it because of his own irresponsibility. I would let him suffer the
> consequences of his actions and learn from his mistakes - a far better
> choice than letting him become dependent on me. I would not coddle him in
> this case or any other. It is not the same as not caring about him, but it
> is the only way I can show that I care. If my borther were a different
> creature, like many that roam this planet, he might try to make me feel
> guilt or shame for not "helping" him. But then I would no longer deal with
> him, because he does not deal with me according to my own rules. If I ever
> did loan my brother money, it would be because I want to help a person whom
> I respect and like, not merely because he is my because he is my brother and
> somehow has a right to my money. I draw the line where ever I choose. I
> will help (usually money because I have more of it than time) people I
> respect - I respect those who respect me and my beliefs.
Right on. I have a brother in law who has exhibited enough cluelessness
and consequence avoidance that he's on the verge of being written off.
> Name one thing we are entitled to. We HAVE rights, but that is different
> from entitlements. Where in the Constitution does it say we are entitled to
> welfare, medical insurance, guns? We may have the right to own guns, but it
> is certainly not the governments responsibility to provide one for everyone!
> Do you follow?
Right on. Key difference here. If you don't get it, re-read. Rights are
about behaviours. Even property rights. There is no RIGHT to goods,
services (property) you have not earned in an honest contract.
Go Objectivist Go!
$ Lar $
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
29 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
