To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 5444
5443  |  5445
Subject: 
Re: Why can't we have a Lando: Lego's Race policy
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.starwars, lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Mon, 1 May 2000 22:58:46 GMT
Viewed: 
24 times
  
In lugnet.starwars, Bruce Schlickbernd writes:
In lugnet.starwars, Mike Petrucelli writes:
In lugnet.starwars, Bruce Schlickbernd writes:
In lugnet.starwars, Mike Petrucelli writes:

(major snippage)
To restate
myself: no one cared that Han and Luke are yellow, why would they care if
Lando is yellow?  All three are human.  All healthy human mini-figs are
yellow.  Why is this so difficult to grasp?

-Lord Insanity

It failed my "Emperors New Clothes" test.  Emperor with non-existant clothes
that no one wanted to admit weren't there, but a child pointed out weren't
there?

Okay, so I explain Lego's policy to my nine year old son, pointing out that • the
standard yellow in Lego is meant to be any race because nobody (healthy) is
actually bright yellow : pacific islander, european, asian and others.  Did • he
think of them as "white" after that?  Yup.  Dominant pale culture and the
yellow is pale, I suppose, and I should note he is by no means in an • all-white
environment.  I suspect he thinks of them as non-black.

I wonder if this has to do with The Simpson's.  I belive that show totally
ruined TLC's concept of neutrality.  Unfortunatly they aren't old enough to
know TLC was first.

He doesn't watch the Simpsons.  And this was before the current
Butterfinger/Simpsons adds.

Oh?!


These are just observations by the way, not particularly criticisms.

Thanks.  I find it very intriging and puzzeling.  Who can argue the innocence
of a child. Tis a pity he sees it that way though.

-Lord Insanity

No, the ones to pity, as in the classic tale, are the adults.  All my son has
to do is look at me and then look at his mom, and figure what a yellow minifig
is closer to.  It's pretty easy.  The key is not hue, but value (relative • light
and dark, to use an artist's terms).  Take a black and white photo of Lego, • and
it will be clearer.

I don't find it all that puzzling, because no one seems (almost literally
beyond me) to have bothered to ask children how they play with and think about
the minifigs.  Let's be very honest, this is a Danish (pale people) selling to
a largely european-descent market (pale people) who chose a pale color to
represent people.  I tend to view their explanation as one they thought of in
retrospect, not beforehand.  I'm not condemning Lego, but I'm not sure I • accept
either their explanation or their policy.  All-yellow seems pretty abstract to
me...but that is as an adult.

I never recall thinking that lego people were 'white'.  In a black and white
photo the tones do make sense though.  I guess because I can rember never
making the association as a child myself, I was not expecting non-Simpson
watching kids to either.  I guess adults are the ones to pity.  Most likely a
child would otherwise never care anyway.

Bruce

FYI: I am 20 and have an excellent memory so I can recall my childhood quite
well.
-Lord Insanity



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Why can't we have a Lando: Lego's Race policy
 
(...) he (...) all-white (...) He doesn't watch the Simpsons. And this was before the current Butterfinger/Simpsons adds. (...) No, the ones to pity, as in the classic tale, are the adults. All my son has to do is look at me and then look at his (...) (25 years ago, 1-May-00, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)

66 Messages in This Thread:
























Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR