To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 5443
5442  |  5444
Subject: 
Re: Why can't we have a Lando: Lego's Race policy
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Mon, 1 May 2000 22:57:32 GMT
Viewed: 
892 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Mike Petrucelli writes:
> 
> > The color of the dog's fur has no more impact upon its breed than a man's • skin
> > has upon his speices.  Different dog breeds have significant physical
> > differences not merely cosmetic ones.
> 
>   How about a chocolate lab vs. a black lab?  Each is prized for certain
> "cosmetic" differences, yet each is a labrador, and each is a dog.
> 
> > As far as I know there are no
> > significant physical differences amoung humans, only cosmetic ones.
> 
>  You ventured in another post that you're either more "mentally well" or "so
> naive it isn't funny."  You don't at face value seem more well than anyone • else
> here, nor would I say you're necessarily naive.  However, it seems that you're
> being deliberately obtuse about this.  No one here has asserted that there's a
> "gene" for race, and a good chunk of this discussion erupted from an innocent,
> off-hand reference to race, according to a vernacular almost universal except
> among Postmodernists and pedants (which may, I grant you, be a redundancy).
>  What you're doing, though, is trivializing the issue of race by presuming
> that it can be eliminated simply by asserting that you don't think that one
> current playing field is valid. Dr. King didn't die because he was trying to
> delineate the genetics of "colored" and "white," yet you're trying very hard • to
> reduce such sacrifices as his to a simplistic question of "don't they get it?"
> Likewise, the lynch mobs of the early 20th century didn't hunt people down • who
> failed a DNA test. The problem of race is real, even if it can't be stratified
> according to some genetic checklist to your liking.
> 
>    Dave!

Glad to see that SOMEONE is on my side, Dave!
-Chris (the one who started this entire posting thread, as well as who made
the offhanded remark of race)



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Why can't we have a Lando: Lego's Race policy
 
(...) First I am not blaming you Chris for using "race" in the manner which you did. Also I would never attempt to trivialize Dr. Martin Luthor King Jr.'s death. I simply can not understand why anyone cares what color skin I or anyone else has. I do (...) (26 years ago, 1-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Why can't we have a Lando: Lego's Race policy
 
(...) How about a chocolate lab vs. a black lab? Each is prized for certain "cosmetic" differences, yet each is a labrador, and each is a dog. (...) You ventured in another post that you're either more "mentally well" or "so naive it isn't funny." (...) (26 years ago, 1-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

17 Messages in This Thread:





Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR