To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 5435
5434  |  5436
Subject: 
Re: Why can't we have a Lando: Lego's Race policy
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Mon, 1 May 2000 22:02:39 GMT
Viewed: 
205 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Chris Maddison writes:
In lugnet.starwars, Mike Petrucelli writes:
-Lord Insanity
(who is still trying to figure out why people don't understand that skin
pigmentation doesn't change one's race, that of human.)

I apologize.  You're right that "race" is the wrong word.  Insert word • that
I
can't think of in it's place (something like ethnic background?)
-Chris

Ethnic backround also has nothing to do with the amount of pigmentation in
one's skin.

-Lord Insanity

Well, OK, that's true also.  So, YOU tell me what word to put there.
-Chris

They same thing you call yourself.  Human.  Either I am mentally well beyond
the rest of you or I am so naive it is not funny.

-Lord Insanity

OK.  Human.  But, we do agree that humans are, in fact, animals, yes?  We try
to separate ourselves from the animals, but we are.  So, I offer this
comparison:
A German Shepard is a dog.
A Dalmatian is a dog.
A German Shepard is not a Dalmatian, nor is a Dalmatian a German Shepard.  So,
is one the same as the other?  So does it make sense to compare a person of
one color/creed/religion/gender/ect. to someone else not of the same
color/creed/religion/gender/etc?  No.  Yes, before you even say it, I know
that we're all human, but still there are differences among "groups" of
humans, just as there are differences among breeds of dogs.  Enguard.
-Chris

The color of the dog's fur has no more impact upon its breed than a man's skin
has upon his speices.  Different dog breeds have significant physical
differences not merely cosmetic ones.  As far as I know there are no
significant physical differences amoung humans, only cosmetic ones.

-Lord Insanity



Message has 3 Replies:
  Re: Why can't we have a Lando: Lego's Race policy
 
(...) So, (...) No physical differences? Ahh, so that's why we're all 6'2" and 200 lbs. Thanks for clearing that up. -Chris (25 years ago, 1-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
  Re: Why can't we have a Lando: Lego's Race policy
 
(...) How about a chocolate lab vs. a black lab? Each is prized for certain "cosmetic" differences, yet each is a labrador, and each is a dog. (...) You ventured in another post that you're either more "mentally well" or "so naive it isn't funny." (...) (25 years ago, 1-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
  Re: Why can't we have a Lando: Lego's Race policy
 
(...) What's the inherent skin tone of dogs? Yellow? I do know for a fact that we've got lots of different hair colors, so Lego would never argue that all animals have the same fur color, including human animals. Oh, yes, and brown-furred wookies. (...) (25 years ago, 3-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Why can't we have a Lando: Lego's Race policy
 
(...) OK. Human. But, we do agree that humans are, in fact, animals, yes? We try to separate ourselves from the animals, but we are. So, I offer this comparison: A German Shepard is a dog. A Dalmatian is a dog. A German Shepard is not a Dalmatian, (...) (25 years ago, 1-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

17 Messages in This Thread:





Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR