To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 26811
26810  |  26812
Subject: 
Re: Ya wanna talk about legislating morality?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Thu, 5 May 2005 18:44:14 GMT
Viewed: 
1078 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:

   But don’t you see-- there is no definitive line! The line is where ever the sensibilities of a society is at any given point in time. Right now the current sensibilities of our society are being offended by certain individuals and society is exerting its right (or as “might” as it was put by Dave!) to curtail it. I see nothing wrong with this. There is a culture war going on. I honestly think that the envelope-pushing, values-distaining Left will lead us to anarchy.

and I honestly think that the envelope-pushing, rights-disdaining Religious Right will lead us to a theocratic dictatorship.

Me, I’ll take anarchy over that any day. ... but then, I’m a minarchist after all..

  
   Here’s something--libertarians get in on this--less gov’t intervention--stop legislating morality!

Um, ya??? What was it you wanted said here Dave? I agree with you, as far as you go. Was that it? Can I doze off again??? Too late... You don’t go far enough in your interest in freedom.

Once you want government to regulate PART of society (oh, I dunno, say... subsidise health care, or legislate guns out of existance for you, or redistribute income to make outcomes “fairer”) you’ve let the camel’s nose in the tent.

Just to pick one example, health care subsidies lead to regulations about what you can eat, how and when you must wear your seatbelts, and what paint you can use on your models (and many other things too), because, after all, we have to minimise health care COSTS!!!



Message has 3 Replies:
  Re: Ya wanna talk about legislating morality?
 
(...) Well, I will be by your side to see that it doesn't happen. (...) Uh, I don't think that you've fully considered the ramifications of such a silly statement. (...) What is that, exactly? (...) Touché! JOHN (19 years ago, 5-May-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
  Re: Ya wanna talk about legislating morality?
 
(...) Huh? Which Dave are we talking about here? Dave! (19 years ago, 5-May-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
  Re: Ya wanna talk about legislating morality?
 
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek wrote: <snip> (...) YOu guys don't have 'socialized health care' but the last time I checked, there are seatbelt laws in the US. And not once during my (almost) 38 years has the gov't told mw what I can (...) (19 years ago, 5-May-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Ya wanna talk about legislating morality?
 
(...) But don't you see-- there is no definitive line! The line is where ever the sensibilities of a society is at any given point in time. Right now the current sensibilities of our society are being offended by certain individuals and society is (...) (19 years ago, 5-May-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

46 Messages in This Thread:














Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR