To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 26805
26804  |  26806
Subject: 
Re: Ya wanna talk about legislating morality?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Thu, 5 May 2005 18:02:49 GMT
Viewed: 
1052 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Koudys wrote:
   In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:
   In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Koudys wrote:
   I hope the ‘better minds’ will prevail in Texas, where legislation is being passed in which cheerleaders aren’t allowed to ‘shake their booty’ anymore--

http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/05/05/cheerleaders.law.reut/index.html

In both these issues--the banning of books and the cheerleader thing the idea--“we’re not sure what constitutes ‘over the line’” was implied.

Everyone wants freedom, but no one is willing to take responsibility for their actions, and so the GP is forced to control irresponsible people’s behavior through their representatives, their elected government officials.

We live in a free society, but that doesn’t mean we are free to do whatever the hell we want.

JOHN

More to the point is the guys doing the legislation want to lock things down but doin’t know where that line is--“banning ‘some’ Shakespeare”--which parts? Banning some cheerleader moves--which moves.

So it’s not that people aren’t accepting personal responsibility (and that’s a good topic for another time), it’s that now we’re getting legisiation on the books where there’s no definitive ‘here’s the line’, thus leaving things up to interpretation, and pretty soon we’ll be back to the ‘50’s where girls skirts have to touch the floors if they’re on their knees ‘cause that’s how the VP interpreted the law.

But don’t you see-- there is no definitive line! The line is where ever the sensibilities of a society is at any given point in time. Right now the current sensibilities of our society are being offended by certain individuals and society is exerting its right (or as “might” as it was put by Dave!) to curtail it. I see nothing wrong with this. There is a culture war going on. I honestly think that the envelope-pushing, values-distaining Left will lead us to anarchy.

JOHN
  
Here’s something--libertarians get in on this--less gov’t intervention--stop legislating morality!

Your idea of personal responsibility could be different than mine, so where does that get us?

Dave K



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: Ya wanna talk about legislating morality?
 
(...) To be honest, the culture war has been going on since before the first human saw another human from outside his family. The culture war continues to this day and will continue until we're all assimilated: it's called society. I accept that (...) (20 years ago, 5-May-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
  Re: Ya wanna talk about legislating morality?
 
(...) and I honestly think that the envelope-pushing, rights-disdaining Religious Right will lead us to a theocratic dictatorship. Me, I'll take anarchy over that any day. ... but then, I'm a minarchist after all.. (...) Um, ya??? What was it you (...) (20 years ago, 5-May-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Ya wanna talk about legislating morality?
 
(...) More to the point is the guys doing the legislation want to lock things down but doin't know where that line is--"banning 'some' Shakespeare"--which parts? Banning some cheerleader moves--which moves. So it's not that people aren't accepting (...) (20 years ago, 5-May-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

46 Messages in This Thread:














Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR