To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 23282
23281  |  23283
Subject: 
Re: To change the tune...
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Fri, 6 Feb 2004 15:05:49 GMT
Viewed: 
1475 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Christopher L. Weeks wrote:
> > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Bruce Schlickbernd wrote:
> > 
> > > Time for true condemnation.  He either lied or blew it.  I really don't care
> > > which at this point - I don't trust his judgment or his honesty.  The key is
> > > "don't trust", for whatever reason.  Time for Dubya to take his lumps.
> > 
> > I care!
> > 
> > If he truly blew it, then he is merely unimaginably stupid.  (Why was it obvious
> > to lots of CIA analysts, reporters, and other nations around the world, and many
> > of us that this whole thing was rigged, but not to our president?)  And while he
> > should perhaps be removed from office,
> 
> Um, why isn't this an impeachable offense? (I admit it, my wife dinged me for
> this... she pointed out that I was screaming for the head of Clinton because he
> was an admitted perjurer (over something relatively unimportant, but the
> principle of not lying under oath DOES matter) but I haven't been screaming for
> the head of Bush very loudly, even though he has lied or distorted the truth
> something fierce over something very very important)

I think you're just mellowing in your old age--we all get there :)

We also pick and choose our battles, but knowing that our friends will be there
when we feel like taking a break from the battles is a good thing.  I'm there
for ya, Larry.

> 
> > the real fault is ours.  We elected
> > him...sort of.
> > 
> > If, on the other hand, he lied to us for the alarming purpose of filling the
> > coffers of the defense and infrastructure industry players who bought him his
> > job(s -- not just the current one), then he should be dragged into the street by
> > his hair...or tie if the hair won't work, and stoned to death by every true
> > American -- particularly the ones who no longer have daddies and husbands.
> 
> Or mommies. Don't forget that our armed forces are now a bit more equal
> opportunity, not all casualties are male.
> 
> ++Lar

Our sons and daughters, husbands and wives, mothers and fathers...  It's time to
re-evaluate the cost.  There is a time for a Just war.  This wasn't it.

Dave K



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: To change the tune...
 
(...) Um, why isn't this an impeachable offense? (I admit it, my wife dinged me for this... she pointed out that I was screaming for the head of Clinton because he was an admitted perjurer (over something relatively unimportant, but the principle of (...) (23 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

55 Messages in This Thread:






















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR