 | | Re: Tony Martin case: You can't {make up} better criticism of Liberals! —Mike Petrucelli
|
| | | (...) Ok seriously, how can you determine that is the only reason someone would have broken into your home? I won't give them the benefit of the doubt, if you want to in your home that is fine. In an idealistic world if I could somehow magically (...) (21 years ago, 25-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Tony Martin case: You can't {make up} better criticism of Liberals! —David Koudys
|
| | | | | (...) ANd right back at you--how can you determine that the guy breaking into your house is out to kill you, instead of just taking your television? Again, look at the stats--thousands on thousands of cases of petty theft and burglary, and a scant (...) (21 years ago, 25-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Tony Martin case: You can't {make up} better criticism of Liberals! —Mike Petrucelli
|
| | | | | | (...) Why would I give someone that broke into my home the benefit of the doubt? (...) I would only incapacitate them if I could do so without risk to my life or loved ones. (such as a swift kick to the back of the head followed by several more to (...) (21 years ago, 25-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Tony Martin case: You can't {make up} better criticism of Liberals! —Kyle Henneberque
|
| | | | | | (...) Point One: Most burglaries occur during the day when nobody is home. This entire issue is a moot point, there is no confrontation. Most burglars hate confrontation. (Partly because it can lead to thier death.) Point Two: Yes, murderous (...) (21 years ago, 28-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Tony Martin case: You can't {make up} better criticism of Liberals! —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | | (...) Cite, please. I've never heard this statistic and would value the chance to review the study that produced it. It's fine if you're employing intentional hyperbole, but that should be made clear to the audience. Dave! (21 years ago, 25-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Tony Martin case: You can't {make up} better criticism of Liberals! —Mike Petrucelli
|
| | | | | | (...) (URL) (...) Its right up there with the myth that police actually prevent crime rather than the reality of the fact that they simply investigating after the fact 99.99 percent of the time. (...) -Mike Petrucelli (21 years ago, 25-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Tony Martin case: You can't {make up} better criticism of Liberals! —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | | | | (...) Thanks for the link. A quick run around the Internet finds no mention of the book except on Amazon and a few dozen rabidly pro-gun websites. In itself, that's not a refutation of the book's value, but I'm hesitant to assess its worth from such (...) (21 years ago, 25-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Tony Martin case: You can't {make up} better criticism of Liberals! —Mike Petrucelli
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Oh the book is obviously conservatively biased, but the basic information pertaining to the Government successfully winning court cases which conclude they have no obligation to respond to 911 calls and/or insure the safty of specific (...) (21 years ago, 26-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Tony Martin case: You can't {make up} better criticism of Liberals! —Richard Marchetti
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Indeed not. The courts have fairly routinely announced that the only time the government is specifically responsible for you is when and if you are "in custody" (i.e. "under arrest") and even then they try to weasel out of responsibility most (...) (21 years ago, 26-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Tony Martin case: You can't {make up} better criticism of Liberals! —David Koudys
|
| | | | | | In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Mike Petrucelli wrote: <snip> (...) <snip> (...) How about having the police services *deter* people from committing crimes in the first place. Its very hard to know when and where a person who is set out to commit a (...) (21 years ago, 25-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Tony Martin case: You can't {make up} better criticism of Liberals! —John Neal
|
| | | | | | (...) Basically what you are arguing for is an increase in law enforcement personnel, which is fine (although adding to the tax burden), but in the end I don't think it will decrease the crime rate that much, although significantly drive pastry (...) (21 years ago, 26-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Tony Martin case: You can't {make up} better criticism of Liberals! —Max Maxwell
|
| | | | | | (...) I would agree that prison is now more of a "resort", and less of a deterrent to criminals and crime. I am certain that many people who are not criminals, but good, hardworking people, DO NOT have health care, exercise equipment or access to (...) (21 years ago, 27-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Tony Martin case: You can't {make up} better criticism of Liberals! —Richard Marchetti
|
| | | | | | This is more of the usual right-wing idiocy. Beat down the victims of right-wing callousness. The problem is not incarcerating real criminals, the problem is the creation of crime! We are trying to legislate morality by creating whole categories of (...) (21 years ago, 27-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Tony Martin case: You can't {make up} better criticism of Liberals! —John Neal
|
| | | | | | (...) Sure, crime isn't the criminal's fault, it's society's! (...) You know, I've been meaning to ask you about that. So what if we have the hightest incarceration rate in the world. Should there be some magical limit? We as a society have certain (...) (21 years ago, 28-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Tony Martin case: You can't {make up} better criticism of Liberals! —Mike Petrucelli
|
| | | | | | | (...) Because it violates the freedom of people who wish to use them without affecting anyone else. Duh. (...) But they do not fall under the category of rape, murder, or stealing and as such only affect those who choose to participate. Anything (...) (21 years ago, 28-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Tony Martin case: You can't {make up} better criticism of Liberals! —John Neal
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Sure, if they would use it without affecting anyone else, but they won't. They will use and drive cars and barges and operate machinery, and kill 1,000s as drunks do today. What about the freedoms of the rest of us? (...) What I am saying is (...) (21 years ago, 29-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Tony Martin case: You can't {make up} better criticism of Liberals! —Mike Petrucelli
|
| | | | | | | | (...) First I should state that I belive we should make driving while intoxicated a capital offense. (meaning that it can be punishable by execution once the court system is overhauled, until them life imprisonment) Second why do you assume that (...) (21 years ago, 29-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Tony Martin case: You can't {make up} better criticism of Liberals! —John Neal
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Um, okay, that's "hard":-) But yes, it is only that kind of "no tolerance" policy that is going to change public behavior. That said, I think it would definitely lead to an increase in the prison population (addressing Richard's qualm), at (...) (21 years ago, 29-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Tony Martin case: You can't {make up} better criticism of Liberals! —Mike Petrucelli
|
| | | | | | | | | (...) I think most people don't do drugs because they don't want to risk their lives/health/saftey, not because it is too expensive. Personally I don't smoke, drink, or do drugs. The bottom line is that using drugs does not fall under the category (...) (21 years ago, 29-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Re: Tony Martin case: You can't {make up} better criticism of Liberals! —Pedro Silva
|
| | | | | | | | | | (...) The problem with drug usage is not the usage "per se", it's what addicts do once they waste all their money. Tipically, the pattern for drug usage is: you have a job and do drugs, then you lose your job (and income) due to the addiction, then (...) (21 years ago, 29-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Tony Martin case: You can't {make up} better criticism of Liberals! —Pedro Silva
|
| | | | | | | | | (...) Can a parallel be drawn with alcohol in the "dry" twenties? Why? (or why not) Pedro (21 years ago, 29-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Tony Martin case: You can't {make up} better criticism of Liberals! —Richard Marchetti
|
| | | | | | | | (...) So instead of legalizing something relatively benign like pharmaceutical grade cocaine or heroin, you have de facto readily available garbage like crack. Crack is cheap, powerfully addictive, and TRULY ruins people's lives quite quickly. What (...) (21 years ago, 29-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Tony Martin case: You can't {make up} better criticism of Liberals! —John Neal
|
| | | | | | | | (...) I'm not sure I follow you. Would people prefer to use these pharmaceutical drugs, or would they opt for the more potent and insidious drugs like crack and ecstasy? (...) lol I hope you are being facetious, but I'd bet you're not! :-) (...) It (...) (21 years ago, 30-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Tony Martin case: You can't {make up} better criticism of Liberals! —Thomas Stangl
|
| | | | | | | | Mandatory life sentences create very dangerous, panicked offenders. If you were DUI and killed someone, and you KNEW that you were guaranteed a life sentence, what exactly do you lose in trying to run, possibly killing more people (think a DUI (...) (21 years ago, 1-Aug-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Tony Martin case: You can't {make up} better criticism of Liberals! —Frank Filz
|
| | | | | | | | (...) This is an incredibly important consideration that the pro-Death Penalty and lock-em-up-and-throw...e-key-away people tend to totally ignore. There are a few things that do justify indefinite incarceration, but very few in my mind, for just (...) (21 years ago, 1-Aug-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Tony Martin case: You can't {make up} better criticism of Liberals! —Richard Marchetti
|
| | | | | | | | | (...) Brown Girl in the Ring? Anyway, William Burroughs wrote an essay on this very idea in the late 70s or early 80s -- it was carried in Heavy Metal magazine. It loosely relates to his novel as screenplay, "Blade Runner." -- Hop-Frog (21 years ago, 1-Aug-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Re: Tony Martin case: You can't {make up} better criticism of Liberals! —Frank Filz
|
| | | | | | | | | | (...) Nope, I was thinking of another one. It's probably been done several times. Frank (21 years ago, 1-Aug-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Tony Martin case: You can't {make up} better criticism of Liberals! —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | | | | | | (...) One reference that would seem to fit your Libertarian philosophy is Michael G. Coney's "The Jaws That Bite, The Claws that Catch." But I don't think that's the one you're referring to. Dave! (21 years ago, 1-Aug-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Tony Martin case: You can't {make up} better criticism of Liberals! —David Koudys
|
| | | | | | | | In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Frank Filz wrote: <snip> (...) I say it's LEXX :) (21 years ago, 5-Aug-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Tony Martin case: You can't {make up} better criticism of Liberals! —Frank Filz
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Gee, lot's of similar references here I guess. I'm thinking of Larry Niven's "The Patchwork Man" (at least I think that's the short story I'm thinking of - Niven actually keeps refering to organ banks). Frank (21 years ago, 5-Aug-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Tony Martin case: You can't {make up} better criticism of Liberals! —Richard Marchetti
|
| | | | | | | (...) Yeah, that's the big problem -- my naïveté! Growing prison populations challenge already cash-strapped states (URL) WASHINGTON (AP) -- America's prison population grew again in 2002 despite a declining crime rate, costing the federal (...) (21 years ago, 28-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Tony Martin case: You can't {make up} better criticism of Liberals! —John Neal
|
| | | | | | | | (...) I said you were naive, not an idiot. But anyway, if you think such powerfully addictive drugs were available to the GP at such low prices, what do you think would occur? How many 1,000s if not 10,000s of junkies would our society have? It (...) (21 years ago, 28-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Tony Martin case: You can't {make up} better criticism of Liberals! —Richard Marchetti
|
| | | | | | (...) It is obvious you have never seen people beaten down by their socio-economic cicumstances as I have. Come to West Oakland, CA and see the situation and tell me that people are absolutely choosing their lifestyles. Now who is being naive? As an (...) (21 years ago, 28-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Tony Martin case: You can't {make up} better criticism of Liberals! —John Neal
|
| | | | | | (...) You defend the more Christian approach? You make me laugh. Your idea is to have the government try and solve the problem, wasting billions of $$$ on beaucracy. How many trillions of dollars have we spent in the past 40 years on welfare (...) (21 years ago, 29-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Tony Martin case: You can't {make up} better criticism of Liberals! —Richard Marchetti
|
| | | | | | (...) Nobody mentioned welfare except for you, John. I emphasized decent education and trade programs. I don't see that you rebutted anything else substantive that I have previously stated either. You set up a straw man and want me to defend it? Not (...) (21 years ago, 29-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Tony Martin case: You can't {make up} better criticism of Liberals! —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | | | (...) I feel obliged to add that we probably haven't spent "trillions" of dollars on welfare unless of course we include the ongoing billions handed to big corporations, and that doesn't really qualify as 'trying to wipe out poverty.' Further, even (...) (21 years ago, 29-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Tony Martin case: You can't {make up} better criticism of Liberals! —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | (...) By owning a gun are you not already doing that? Statistically, is the weapon not more likely to kill one of your own household than it is an intruder? Scott A (21 years ago, 25-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Tony Martin case: You can't {make up} better criticism of Liberals! —Mike Petrucelli
|
| | | | (...) That is a flawed statistic. It applies to persons that own a gun but have never used it until they had to. (Which unfortunately is a lot of people) In my case I know how to properly use the weapon. Besides in close quaters a bladed weapon is (...) (21 years ago, 25-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Tony Martin case: You can't {make up} better criticism of Liberals! —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | (...) Nope. Statistically, the person you are most likely to kill with that gun is yourself. (...) No, it applies to all gun use. Scott A (21 years ago, 25-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Tony Martin case: You can't {make up} better criticism of Liberals! —Mike Petrucelli
|
| | | | | (...) WTF? Did you even read my post? -Mike Petrucelli (21 years ago, 26-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Tony Martin case: You can't {make up} better criticism of Liberals! —Kyle Henneberque
|
| | | | (...) If you look down the barrel and pull the trigger, sure. It is very unlikely that you kill yourself with a gun unless it is intentional. It does however, happen, it is just very rare. (...) The way around that is proper gun use through training (...) (21 years ago, 28-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Tony Martin case: You can't {make up} better criticism of Liberals! —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | (...) "One of the most common problems with handguns are unintentional deaths and injuries that occur when people handle guns. Approximately 17,000 unintentional gunshot wounds are treated in U.S. hospitals each year - 1 every 30 minutes, and (...) (21 years ago, 28-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | |
