To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 11106
11105  |  11107
Subject: 
Re: boulders on shoulders
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Tue, 19 Jun 2001 17:09:21 GMT
Viewed: 
805 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Katie Dokken writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Duane Hess writes:
> 
> > As I interpreted it, and mind you it could be a case of snippage, she was
> > responding to "A failing on minorities and women to understand the
> > Libertarian message?". She seemed to be pointing out that she is a woman and
> > does get the message. It just so happens that she has other things taking
> > priority over an active role in the LP, some of them being sexual bias which
> > is still common in todays American society.

> You hit the nail on the head.  I was trying to respond to the "a failing on
> minorities and women to understand the Libertarian message."

  Katie, at the risk of enflaming your obvious passion on this issue, have
you been reading Bruce's clarifications (and/or mine) of Bruce's original
point?  He's several times rephrased the original post, but it seems that
you're irritated at a misreading of his message.  Bruce did not say that
women and minorities don't get the LP message.  He's saying (and has said
numerous times) that women and minorities *do* get the LP message, but they
don't think it's convincing or viable.  The tone of Bruce's post (to which
you seem to take such exception) was ironic; he asked if women and
minorities aren't a major part of the LP because they "don't get" the
message, but the actual meaning (to even a casual, but thoughtful reading)
was that women and minorities understand completely, and *that* is the
reason, Bruce suggests, that women and minorities are represented in such
limited numbers.

      Dave!



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: boulders on shoulders
 
(...) You can clarify all you want, I've read them all. I think Katie raised a valid point though. (...) It may not be that it *isn't* convincing, or viable. It may just be that women and minorities are too busy fighting other fires to participate. (...) (25 years ago, 19-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
  Re: boulders on shoulders
 
(...) At the risk of starting another thread, I have been reading the posts, but this whole new thing of reading a post, responding, then going and downloading my email, pulling up the emailed link for the posting, clicking on the button to post the (...) (25 years ago, 19-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: boulders on shoulders
 
(...) Duane, You hit the nail on the head. I was trying to respond to the "a failing on minorities and women to understand the Libertarian message." Katie (25 years ago, 19-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

50 Messages in This Thread:











Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR