Subject:
|
Re: boulders on shoulders
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 19 Jun 2001 21:12:38 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
313 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Duane Hess writes:
> I've been re-reading your original and unsnipped post. It's taken me a
> while, but I may have just sorted out what you were trying to say. I still
> find it to be an inflammatory question, although I now think it to be mostly
> rhetorical. Am I getting warmer?
It wasn't meant as rhetorical - it was a searching question. It most
certainly wasn't a statement of the way things are. Examples tossed out for
discussion - there could be other possiblities that I hadn't thought of, nor
was I trying to present what I did as an exhaustive list of possiblities. I
wasn't trying to say that women and minorities were incapable of
understanding the Libertarian ideals (my wife would be hitting me on both
counts, if that was the case <g>), just that those ideals may not have been
fully covered (not everyone reads the same things or moves in the same
circles for example, which is more along the lines I was thinking).
>
> >
> > > > > I think Katie just vented some pent-up frustration and unfortunately >>>>Bruce's post was the catalyst.
> > > >
> > > > Well, I'd like to let Katie speak for herself (and Bruce can likewise
> > > > correct my interpretations of his posts if I am incorrect) but it's odd to
> > > > me that a post from one of the biggest local opponents against
> > > > Libertarianism is singled out as if it were a recruitment poster for the >party.
> >
> > Very odd - so odd one most wonder if she could in fact be mistaken? Read my
> > post that Katie originally responded to. Tell me specifically why you think
> > it is a "recruitment poster" (I hear Larry laughing his butt off somewhere).
> > I can respond to that. If you can come up with something concrete, let me
> > know. Vague insinuations just muddy the waters further.
>
> Hmmm... Not a quote from my post.
Oops. Dave. Read it wrong. Banging head against wall. Doh! My fault.
Bruce
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: boulders on shoulders
|
| (...) I've been re-reading your original and unsnipped post. It's taken me a while, but I may have just sorted out what you were trying to say. I still find it to be an inflammatory question, although I now think it to be mostly rhetorical. Am I (...) (23 years ago, 19-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
50 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
