Subject:
|
Re: boulders on shoulders
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 19 Jun 2001 17:29:36 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
239 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler writes:
> Katie, at the risk of enflaming your obvious passion on this issue, have
> you been reading Bruce's clarifications (and/or mine) of Bruce's original
> point?
At the risk of starting another thread, I have been reading the posts, but this
whole new thing of reading a post, responding, then going and downloading my
email, pulling up the emailed link for the posting, clicking on the button to
post the response, and then coming back to Lugnet to figure out just where you
were in the whole thread thing, is really getting old fast. I did originally
respond to the first post but it didn't go through. Maybe its still stuck in
my email, I have no idea.
> He's several times rephrased the original post, but it seems that
> you're irritated at a misreading of his message. Bruce did not say that
> women and minorities don't get the LP message. He's saying (and has said
> numerous times) that women and minorities *do* get the LP message, but they
> don't think it's convincing or viable.
And I disagree. I do get the message and I may or may not agree with some or
all of it, and my "lack" of participation in the LP has nothing to do with
whether or not I agree with the message or think that its "convincing or
viable". I'm not involved in any party at all. I know some people say that
its every citizens duty to be involved in their government but many of us
aren't, though I do vote. And unless Bruce is a woman or a minority, just how
can he presume to know how "we" feel about it?
Just a thought.
Katie
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: boulders on shoulders
|
| (...) I meant it as something of a joke, but I see I was correct: that ain't a chip on your shoulder, it's a boulder! If you are a Libertarian who can't be bothered, that's a personal problem of yours. If you are saying there are hordes of (...) (23 years ago, 19-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | Re: boulders on shoulders
|
| (...) Fair enough. I should assert outright that a previous post of mine will probably have hit before this one makes it to the board, so I'm sorry if I overlap. We've gotten to the crux of your dispute with his post; that he seems to be speaking on (...) (23 years ago, 19-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: boulders on shoulders
|
| (...) Katie, at the risk of enflaming your obvious passion on this issue, have you been reading Bruce's clarifications (and/or mine) of Bruce's original point? He's several times rephrased the original post, but it seems that you're irritated at a (...) (23 years ago, 19-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
50 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
