To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.market.theoryOpen lugnet.market.theory in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Marketplace / Theory / 707
706  |  708
Subject: 
Re: Slim pickings everwhere (Was: Slim Pickings at Target)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.market.theory
Date: 
Tue, 28 Dec 1999 02:28:04 GMT
Viewed: 
737 times
  
Of course, the other snafu is that existing forecasting software works by the
SKU, on products that are available over a period long enough to amass a
statistical base.  This kind of blows the system for new products, which is
basically the scenario you describe below.

Works for me!

- Greg

Kevin Salm wrote:

In lugnet.market.theory, Greg Crisp writes:
A couple of comments:

1. Most large retail chains these days use inventory forecasting software, • such
as IBM's INFOREM, that does all sorts of statistical analysis on past sales
trends (per SKU, incidentally) to forecast probable sales.  These forecasts • are
turned in to the orders that are sent to the distributor.  An additional twist
on this is when the retailer trusts the distributor enough to give them the • keys
to the process.  The vendor then manages the retailer's inventory for them. • Not
sure if TRU or TLC go this far with it, but I am sure they use some sort of
forecasting software to manage this.


I have no argument or disagreement with what you say.  However, the added twist
to this is that whoever does the actual ordering for the large chains (at
corporate or warehouse-by-warehouse region) has to do so with very little
information from TLC.

This is due to many factors.

During the toy fair season (January mostly, I believe) toy manufacturers and
distributors show thier upcoming product lines.  It is hard for us to know how
much advanced information TLC has at this point.  I am sure that the majority
of new items are on live display but many may not be as they are still under
development.  It is at this time of year that dealers and end retailers must
submit their orders for the coming months.  This includes expected delivery
dates as late in the year as October and November, depending upon the dealer
[1] (I'm talking size of dealer here--independent versus mega-retailer).

This toy fair ordering is done mostly with an order form that includes
information which may only include Item number, item theme, set name, number of
pieces, MSRP, and case pack count.  Except for those specific items on display
at the Toy Fairs, no pictures or images may be available at the time of
ordering.  The order sheet is often just a few pages with no pictures of the
Lego sets at all.
So, esentially, the dealers are ordering items that they do not know much
about. And beyond the toy fairs, this system continues throughout the year. [2]

TLC does produe full-color dealer catalogs, but these are most often
distributed well after the major ordering period of toy fair is over.  They are
used to help retailers order more stock, but again, this stock has targeted
delivery dates of several months away. [3]

There may be other factors that I am personally unaware of, and if anyone knows
specifics, I am sure we would all like to be better informed.

1. One independent retailer I know places advance orders for Lego at the toy
fairs for expected delivery through at least July with the option of reordering
for October delivery in May and then Holiday delivery as early as June or July.

2.  read #1 above

3.  Even though the dealer catalogs arrive before the product, it has to be
ordered before the catalog arrives in most cases.  Take the 200 SW for example:
Dealers received the catalogs in the late fall, but orders had to be placed
for the items in the catalogs months before making the catalog somewhat
useless.  As stated before, they ARE helpful for re-orders, however.

--

G. Crisp - gcrisp@mindspring.com

"Indian, indian, what did you die for?  Indian says 'Nothing at all.'"
-- Jim Morrison



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Slim pickings everwhere (Was: Slim Pickings at Target)
 
Which goes back to what I was saying in the first place, everyone is trying to predict the future and not dealing with what actually happens. No inventory balancing. If Mos Espas sell out in one store, and the store 50 miles away can't move them at (...) (25 years ago, 28-Dec-99, to lugnet.market.theory)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Slim pickings everwhere (Was: Slim Pickings at Target)
 
(...) such (...) are (...) keys (...) Not (...) I have no argument or disagreement with what you say. However, the added twist to this is that whoever does the actual ordering for the large chains (at corporate or warehouse-by-warehouse region) has (...) (25 years ago, 27-Dec-99, to lugnet.market.theory)

44 Messages in This Thread:



















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR