To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.market.buy-sell-tradeOpen lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Marketplace / Buy/Sell/Trade / 6007
6006  |  6008
Subject: 
Re: No more spam from Helge Viker
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade
Date: 
Wed, 10 May 2000 03:32:55 GMT
Reply-To: 
mattdm@mattdm./Spamless/org
Viewed: 
21 times
  
Kevin Salm <kdsalm@dreamscape.com> wrote:
From my perspective, the use of the word SPAM [1] to define the offending email
is inappropriate.  It can be assumed that the only recipients were known Lego
[snip]

Yes, technically it was Unsolicited Commercial E-mail (UCE), or perhaps even
Unsolicited Bulk Commercial E-mail. But these days the term "spam" (not
upper-case SPAM Luncheon Meat, the trademarked, um, food product) is used as
a generic term covering a whole host of ills.

--
Matthew Miller                      --->                  mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us                     --->               http://quotes-r-us.org/
Boston University Linux             --->                http://linux.bu.edu/



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: No more spam from Helge Viker
 
(...) A happy ending for this episode, hopefully. I have been reading this thread as-it-happened (I get b-s-t via email) and one thing puzzles me about the whole affair. No one went on record to explain why the original email from Helge was, could, (...) (25 years ago, 10-May-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade)

32 Messages in This Thread:














Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR