Subject:
|
Re: WARNING: spam from Helge Viker
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Fri, 5 May 2000 18:19:32 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
4960 times
|
| |
|
|
Todd Lehman wrote:
>
> In lugnet.admin.general, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> > - statement in the TOS that sending unsolicited mail using addresses obtained
> > ANY other way is a TOS violation and may subject you to prosecution, etc. not
> > just getting TOSsed.
>
> Excellent idea! Probably no way to enforce it, but still worth mentioning as
> it is important to discourage this by default.
So if someone posts something about something they built,
but didn't ask for comments, and then I email them to
ask how they built it, that would be a violation of the Terms,
or even a crime? That doesn't sound appropriate to me.
/Eric McC/
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: WARNING: spam from Helge Viker
|
| (...) Well I think this is a good point maybe the statement should read more like this.. (Using Larry's statement as a starting point) "Sending unsolicited BULK e-mail using addresses obtained via any unapproved mechanism on LUGNET is a TOS (...) (26 years ago, 5-May-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
32 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
