Subject:
|
Re: WARNING: spam from Helge Viker
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Fri, 5 May 2000 18:28:58 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
925 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Charles Eric McCarthy writes:
> Todd Lehman wrote:
> >
> > In lugnet.admin.general, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> > > - statement in the TOS that sending unsolicited mail using addresses
> > > obtained ANY other way is a TOS violation and may subject you to
> > > prosecution, etc. not
> > > just getting TOSsed.
> >
> > Excellent idea! Probably no way to enforce it, but still worth mentioning
> > as it is important to discourage this by default.
>
> So if someone posts something about something they built,
> but didn't ask for comments, and then I email them to
> ask how they built it, that would be a violation of the Terms,
> or even a crime? That doesn't sound appropriate to me.
Well I think this is a good point maybe the statement should read more like
this.. (Using Larry's statement as a starting point)
"Sending unsolicited BULK e-mail using addresses obtained via any unapproved
mechanism on LUGNET is a TOS violation and may subject you to prosecution."
Then listing the "Approved mechanisms" of which I don't think there are any at
the moment.
Eric Kingsley
The New England LEGO Users Group
http://www.nelug.org/
View My Creations at:
http://www.nelug.org/members/kingsley/
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: WARNING: spam from Helge Viker
|
| (...) So if someone posts something about something they built, but didn't ask for comments, and then I email them to ask how they built it, that would be a violation of the Terms, or even a crime? That doesn't sound appropriate to me. /Eric McC/ (25 years ago, 5-May-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
32 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
