Subject:
|
Re: Discussion Post: Auczilla
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.market.auction
|
Date:
|
Thu, 17 Dec 1998 20:35:27 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1767 times
|
| |
|
|
Todd Lehman wrote:
>
>
> I think VI was really the one that "got away." Here are the approximate
> historical sizes:
>
> Auction - Pieces - Packages
>
> I - 30,000 - 85
> II - 5,000 - 72
> III - 30,000 - 87
> IV - 95,000 - 185
> V - 210,000 - 276
> VI - 225,000 - 343 <--- peak
> VII - 155,000 - 281
> VIII - 110,000 - 290
> : : :
> IX - 50,000? 200?
> X - 30,000? 150?
> : : :
So where does the Monstra Auction fall into this? Wasn't that
the auction with the different name?
--
Paul Foster
http://reality.sgi.com/foster_stco/lego.html
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Discussion Post: Auczilla
|
| (...) I think VI was really the one that "got away." Here are the approximate historical sizes: Auction - Pieces - Packages I - 30,000 - 85 II - 5,000 - 72 III - 30,000 - 87 IV - 95,000 - 185 V - 210,000 - 276 VI - 225,000 - 343 <--- peak VII - (...) (28 years ago, 17-Dec-98, to lugnet.market.auction)
|
37 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
