Subject:
|
Re: Australian Standards for LEGO
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.loc.au
|
Date:
|
Tue, 23 May 2000 23:57:28 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1099 times
|
| |
|
|
"Peter Callaway" <pcallaway@bmcl.com.au> wrote in message
news:Fv098q.Lxp@lugnet.com...
> In lugnet.loc.au, David Drew writes:
> > Actually, technic would be more along the lines of AS1170 (minus the • moving
> > parts of course) due to the beams and pin connectors. :)
>
>
> Guys, guys. C'mon! Concrete? Loadings? I'd at least put it in as a • suppliment
> to AS4100,
Argh! I got 4100 and 1170 confused *starts self-flagelation with birch
sticks*
Bah, I've been studying too much mining engineering for my thesis recently.
Hmm, perhaps I should apply the Korobov implentation of the positive moving
cone technique for pit optimisation to determine the optimum way to dig
through a bucket of lego to find a specific piece of random distribution.
It'd certainly be less computationally expensive than the Lerchs-Grossman
method. I should put it in as an appendix to my thesis. :)
> Structural LEGO is more akin to steel than concrete
Yeah, that's what I meant. Technic pins = bolted joints. Normal lego
probably requires AS3700 in its application, notably part 5. :)
> </engineering geek mode>
Sorry, but I don't think that's possible. :) The question for bonus marks
is; how many degrees of freedom does Peter White's wife give him (a) before
and (b) after a huge lego spending spree. :)
later,
David Drew.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Australian Standards for LEGO
|
| David Drew wrote in message ... (...) Ah, but you see I have actually been lucky enough to meet Peter's wife, and I have to say she is amazingly cool about the staggering proportion of the house that his Lego occupies. Man, those bonus marks would (...) (25 years ago, 24-May-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Australian Standards for LEGO
|
| (...) Guys, guys. C'mon! Concrete? Loadings? I'd at least put it in as a suppliment to AS4100, since perhaps Parts 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 are directly applicable. Structural LEGO is more akin to steel than concrete, and the loading code is only used to (...) (25 years ago, 23-May-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
35 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
