| |
In lugnet.lego.direct, Rose Regner writes:
> > Well, yes, your comments and those of Richard. Thankfully, I only see
> > Richard's posts on the web, and not my newsreader. ;-)
>
> Fine, I'll just stop posting on LUGNET.
Very bad wording on my part... whoops. And I'm out of my room too away from
the newsreader where I can cancel posts.
Rose - my comment about having a filter on Richard's messages was not aimed
as a slight against you. It was expressing my dislike for the intensity and
sometimes offensiveness of his messages. I'm sorry if you took it that way.
I believe you have really good opinions of LEGO and marketing, so does
Richard, he just goes about it in a way that I find offensive. I think we
all agree for the most part, but its different methods of going about saying
something that upsets me. I have not put any filter on your messages, and
based on your comments thus far I see no need to.
I'm sorry if I've offended you.
> > I'm very disappointed at LEGO's marketing plans, but I'm encouraged by • areas
> > like Direct. I don't think its beneficial to any of us to slam LEGO, but
> > that could be more on an individual level. People like Richard will not be
> > given weight by certain people in LEGO because of the offensive nature of
> > his comments. They welcome honest comments (they've told me), but getting
> > personal at the employees and at other LUGNET members who differ in opinion
> > is a good way not to be taken seriously.
>
> I think you just did this by the above statement. Thanks for your input.
Ick...open mouth, insert foot. I *really* wasn't thinking when I said this,
and didn't see that I was doing the very thing I said I didn't like.
Again, sorry, when I get back to my place I'll take care of that post.
-Tim
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
53 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
