To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.lego.directOpen lugnet.lego.direct in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 LEGO Company / LEGO Direct / 2084
2083  |  2085
Subject: 
Re: What Kids really want. Not Juniorization.
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.general
Date: 
Mon, 5 Mar 2001 19:53:53 GMT
Viewed: 
2225 times
  
"Mike Petrucelli" <lordinsanity@usa.net> wrote in message
news:G9qJwF.Gqu@lugnet.com...
[snip]

TLC needs to stop marketing to kids in general and start marketing to kids
that like construction toys.
[snip]

Mike, you have gotten to the core of what bothers me about LEGO's marketing
strategy and direction over the last several years.  I am what you would
call a "traditionalist" - it's all about the bricks and the sets.  CD-roms,
video games, t-shirts, etc. are all diversions that, potentially, draw
resources and effort away from the core product - bricks.

LEGO needs to take a long, hard look at Mike's statement, above, and face
the reality that there are some kids out there who will never, ever play
with Lego bricks.  For these kids, Lego bricks will never capture their
imagination no matter how hard LEGO tries (we all know kids like this,
either currently or from our own childhood).  Therefore, any marketing
and/or production efforts in their direction will fail.

Everybody remember what happened to McDonalds when they tried to get into
serving pizza?  The lesson here is that there are already companies out
there (Nintendo, Sony, etc.) who will always be heads and shoulders above
LEGO in their respective fields because that is what they do.  Nintendo
isn't trying to produce plastic building blocks; they're doing video games
because that is the company's focus.  Why then is LEGO trying to produce
video games?

Instead of throwing good money after bad, LEGO needs to focus on their core
brand and their core constituents (of which AFOLs are a part, albiet small
part).  IMHO, that means getting rid of all the extra, non-brick and non-set
related items, and focusing on being the #1 brand among construction toy
families.  As the #1 brand among construction toy families, they should be
able to insure prosperity for years to come.

Thanks everyone for listening (I hope this did not come off as too much of a
rant, but rather as a continuation of a discussion, which is what I was
shooting for).

Tim

PS.  I am not suggesting that LEGO not continue to work on brick related
computer items such as CAD programs to assist building.  However, such
"side" ventures should be directly related to the core business.



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: What Kids really want. Not Juniorization.
 
(...) I think you're missing something here. Nintendo and Sony are in the positions they're in because when someone said, back in 1982, "The lesson here is that there are already companies out there (Atari, Mattel, etc.) who will always be heads and (...) (24 years ago, 5-Mar-01, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.general)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: What Kids really want. Not Juniorization.
 
(...) Yet this "marketing reasearch" directly contradicts that which I observed as an Assistant Manager at KB Toys. As my original post stated many parents and kids thought Mega Blocks sets were the good Lego sets. Most of the people that know the (...) (24 years ago, 5-Mar-01, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.general)

53 Messages in This Thread:

















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR