 | | New sets for 2001... finally —Eric Lanteigne
|
| | | I bought yet another 3033 today and while I was sorting it, I stumble on a new pamphlet. This is probably not new to a lot of people but this is what I found: (Those are not particularly the official names. I'm just trying to give a very short (...) (24 years ago, 22-Oct-00, to lugnet.general) !!
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: New sets for 2001... finally —Kevin Loch
|
| | | | | Is this this 2001 catalog??! Plase scan the whole thing at 100dpi (with magazine descreen) and upload it to ftp://ftp.brickshelf.../incoming/ (or email it to me at kloch@opnsys.com). For best results, remove the staples and scan each page flat. What (...) (24 years ago, 22-Oct-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: New sets for 2001... finally —Adam Murtha
|
| | | | | SCAN IT. SCAN IT. SCAN IT. Lets see this! Finally! Did I mention you should scan this! ~Adam (...) found: (...) (24 years ago, 22-Oct-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: New sets for 2001... finally —Eric Joslin
|
| | | | | (...) Oh no, oh no no, it's new. Please, please, please, please, PLEASE scan it. In the meantime- is there any evidence of Stormtroopers in the Star Wars sets? The rumour is that they were going to be in the TIE Fighter set. eric (24 years ago, 22-Oct-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: New sets for 2001... finally —Eric Lanteigne
|
| | | | | | (...) new (...) The rumor is true. I forgot that importnat detail in my description. The set comes with two Stormtroopers - one black and one white. Eric. (24 years ago, 22-Oct-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: New sets for 2001... finally —Eric Joslin
|
| | | | | | | (...) My bet is closer inspection will reveal that the black one is the TIE Pilot, who wears black. Urgh. I was hoping for at least two of them in the set. Having one TIE for each Stormtrooper is going to get expensive quick. I guess I could open a (...) (24 years ago, 22-Oct-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: New sets for 2001... finally —Adrick Tolliver
|
| | | | | | (...) sets? (...) Ok, now can you please, PLEASE scan it and put it up on brickshlef? Adrick P.S. Scan it. Now. Thank you. (24 years ago, 22-Oct-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | New sets for 2001... finally (Pictures) —Eric Lanteigne
|
| | | | | (...) found: (...) I do not have a scanner but I tried to get the best pictures I could using Vision Command for Mindstorms. I put 24 pictures on a temporary site (because my official site isn't ready yet). In trying to get the best resolution (...) (24 years ago, 22-Oct-00, to lugnet.general) !!
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: New sets for 2001... finally (Pictures) —Mark Sandlin
|
| | | | | | | (...) <sniiiii-iiiip> (...) in a pack with the TIE, or is that just the pic? The AT-ST looks about as bad as I expected. The Bionicals look to be TLC answering the call for mecha, with the recent popularity of Gundam Wing (though these aren't that (...) (24 years ago, 22-Oct-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: New sets for 2001... finally (Pictures) —Steve Burge
|
| | | | | | | | Hmmm.... I think the ATST looks OK actually (Not brilliant, just OK). The head looks great, but the legs look a tad iffy... But then again, there's a lot of Star Wars sets that I've looked at the picture on the box and gone 'That's Poo!', but once (...) (24 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: New sets for 2001... finally (Pictures) —Eric Joslin
|
| | | | | | | | (...) I agree. I guess I'm not too disappointed because we knew the price point... I *knew* the legs would be 1x's with click hinges (which seem to be the model designer's new obsession). The head, meanwhile, looks MUCH better than I expected. My (...) (24 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: New sets for 2001... finally (Pictures) —Adam Murtha
|
| | | | | | | Thanks for the pic Eric. Some of the new Star Wars looks nice. The Tie looks good, but can't tell about the pilot or stormtrooper really without a better pic. The shuttle is larger than I thought it would be, and it has two red imperial guards, that (...) (24 years ago, 22-Oct-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: New sets for 2001... finally (Pictures) —Raphael P. Jacquot
|
| | | | | | | | (...) unfortunately, yes, it looks like more throwbots... (24 years ago, 22-Oct-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: New sets for 2001... finally (Pictures) —Paul Gyugyi
|
| | | | | | | | Whoo Hoo! Yes! Need. More. Throwbots. Steve Jackson, are you listening: We need GURPS BIONICLE! LegoHAMMER 2K! A Space Hulk ZNAP theme bucket. BTW, is there an agreed-upon catagory name that covers Throwbots, Roboriders and Bionicle? Could we call (...) (24 years ago, 24-Oct-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: New sets for 2001... finally (Pictures) —Mark Sandlin
|
| | | | | | | | (...) I think the term you're looking for is: SPUDs <gdr> ~Mark (24 years ago, 24-Oct-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: New sets for 2001... finally (Pictures) —Andy Verner
|
| | | | | | | | (...) I built a helicopter out of parts from Amazon, Electro, Jet, and a few assorted pins and axles. (Okay, the rotors aren't Throwbots either, but at any rate they're mounted on Amazon's central gear.) And yes, it is more than a Throwbot with (...) (24 years ago, 24-Oct-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: New sets for 2001... finally (Pictures) —Bradley Dale
|
| | | | | | | | | (...) That is so cool! I have Jet and Amazon already, so I'll get Electro next to try your suggestion. Here's what I've done so far- Jet- mechanized Velociraptor Jet- mechanized Brachiosaurus Amazon- mechanized Ostrich Amazon- mechanized Anaconda (...) (24 years ago, 24-Oct-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Re: New sets for 2001... finally (Pictures) —Andy Verner
|
| | | | | | | | | | (...) Hmm... I 'll see if I can manage some of those. I once got sort of a "bird" mode by slightly modifying Jet's carrying-case mode, and I've built Super Jet by adding parts from Granite, but the helicopter's the only really original thing I've (...) (24 years ago, 25-Oct-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: New sets for 2001... finally (Pictures) —Bradley Dale
|
| | | | | | | | | | | (...) Well, I do consider Throwbots to be the abstract art of the LEGO world. It is fun. I'm sure not everyone sees my creations the way I do, although they do look like mechanized animals of some sort. (24 years ago, 25-Oct-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: New sets for 2001... finally (Pictures) —Jonathan Wilson
|
| | | | | | | | | | | (...) I dont know where you live but perhaps there are busses??? (24 years ago, 26-Oct-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: New sets for 2001... finally (Pictures) —Andy Verner
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | (...) Nope. Suburbs, unfortunately. No buses, no taxis, no place within walking or biking distance. (24 years ago, 29-Oct-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: New sets for 2001... finally (Pictures) —Shiri Dori
|
| | | | | | | | | | (...) Ahhh- rough. I don't drive quite yet, but I get my parents to drive me to some stores once a few months, and otherwise I try to buy stuff online or from S@H (til now I'd ask permission to use my parents' CC, now I have my own Visa/ATM card). (...) (24 years ago, 26-Oct-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.people)
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: New sets for 2001... finally (Pictures) —James Brown
|
| | | | | | | | | | In lugnet.general, Shiri Dori writes: <snip> (...) <snip> Oh boy. Now comes the slow downward slide. ;) James (melting his fair share of non-ABS plastic) (24 years ago, 26-Oct-00, to lugnet.people)
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: New sets for 2001... finally (Pictures) —Paul Gyugyi
|
| | | | | | | | So how many years ago did I coin the term SPUD (single purpose useless decorative)? I believe it was directed at the large Pirate items, rowboats in particular. The Bionicle torsos have a gear assembly: turn a wheel in the back, and the arms go up (...) (24 years ago, 28-Oct-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: New sets for 2001... finally (Pictures) —Jay Cal
|
| | | | | | | (...) minute (...) you thank you nk you thank you thank thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you you thank you thank ythank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you ou thank you thank you thank you thank you thank (...) (24 years ago, 22-Oct-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: New sets for 2001... finally (Pictures) —John Radtke
|
| | | | | | | Many, many thanks, Eric, for the list and pics! Am I going crazy or do I remember seeing white TIE fighters for the last 23 years? I know color accuracy is a big complaint in the Star Wars line, but in this case the difference is literally black and (...) (24 years ago, 22-Oct-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: New sets for 2001... finally (Pictures) —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | | | | | (...) You're crazy. ;) The TIEs have always been black/grey. The rebels, IMO, are more white than LEGO has tended to depict them. Steve (24 years ago, 22-Oct-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: New sets for 2001... finally (Pictures) —Eric Joslin
|
| | | | | | | | | (...) Slow down there! The Kenner TIE fighter toy was very, very white. Because of this, a lot of people remember the TIE fighter as being white in the movie (kids like me had a lot more exposure to the toys than the movies for years, after all). (...) (24 years ago, 22-Oct-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Re: New sets for 2001... finally (Pictures) —Erik Olson
|
| | | | | | | | | | (...) For years before the toys were common, there were Star Wars cards. If you were a kid in 1977 you spent a lot more time looking at these than the actual movie. My prize Red #131, obtained in a gum pack in 1977, shows Darth Vader's fighter the (...) (24 years ago, 22-Oct-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | TIEs have always been dark blue in the films —David Simmons
|
| | | | | | | | But the toy manufacturers never seem to get details like this right. I remember quite clearly that in addition to the TIE toy being the wrong color, it also had only one laser light that was the wrong color (red) when it should have been green! They (...) (24 years ago, 24-Oct-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: TIEs have always been dark blue in the films —Josh Opotzner
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Look what they did with the AT-ST! They don't even have the right figure with it! Seriously, I'm very dissapointed with the AT-ST. It looks around $15, and I was looking forward to buying about a trillion at that price, simply because the'd be (...) (24 years ago, 24-Oct-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: TIEs have always been dark blue in the films —Bradley Dale
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Actualy, the MSRP of the AT-AT is only $9.99 US. I think it will be a good value. What's bigger than a trillion? (24 years ago, 24-Oct-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: TIEs have always been dark blue in the films —Nils Becker
|
| | | | | | | | A googol is larger than a trillion (1,000,000,000,000,0...00,000,000 or 10 to the 100th power). (...) (24 years ago, 24-Oct-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: TIEs have always been dark blue in the films —Jonathan Nichol
|
| | | | | | | | You forgot a zero. It should be a 1 with 100 zeros after it. Of course then there's a googolplex, which is a 1 with googol zeros after it. But the biggest number of all is just an 8 lying on its side.... (24 years ago, 25-Oct-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: New sets for 2001... finally (Pictures) —David Eaton
|
| | | | | | | 1st off, many thanks Eric! - Love the Imperial Shuttle - TIE pretty much as expected, but with bonus of Stormtrooper! - AT-ST is kinda ugly, but take a look at: (URL) is that not a 6x6 SOLID radar dish? Perhaps 5x5? Compare chewie with the dish... (...) (24 years ago, 22-Oct-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: New sets for 2001... finally (Pictures) —Shiri Dori
|
| | | | | | | (...) Dang it, no new castle stuff?... ohhhhh... Thanks for the pictures and info, Eric! The SW sets look... umm... I really can't tell ;-). But at least those tan and dk. grey bulk pieces are coming around.... some'n to work with, finally!! -Shiri (...) (24 years ago, 22-Oct-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.castle)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: New sets for 2001... finally (Pictures) —Erin Windross
|
| | | | | | | Could it be? The return of Monorail?! (URL) do you think? Erin -- (24 years ago, 22-Oct-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: New sets for 2001... finally (Pictures) —Jeremy Rear
|
| | | | | | | | Tubes, not monorail. :-( -jeremy (...) (24 years ago, 22-Oct-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: New sets for 2001... finally (Pictures) —Andy Verner
|
| | | | | | | | (...) ::shouts a long string of vulgar expletives:: Oh well. I don't have room for a monorail layout anyway. && (24 years ago, 24-Oct-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: New sets for 2001... finally (Pictures) —Damian Garcia
|
| | | | | | | "Eric Lanteigne" <elanteigne@home.com> wrote in message news:G2tLGo.333@lugnet.com... (...) Is it me or do the "Martians" look like Battle Droids with funny heads? It looks like they are recycling the Hydronaught blue-chrome helmets. Seems like a (...) (24 years ago, 22-Oct-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: New sets for 2001... finally (Pictures) —Kevin Zwicker
|
| | | | | | | | | (...) The Martians remind me of the ants from "Antz" or "A Bug's Life". (...) I believe you are right! Yessss! Kev Z #142 (24 years ago, 22-Oct-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: New sets for 2001... finally (Pictures) —Eric Joslin
|
| | | | | | | | (...) They certainly seem to be. I'm not sure how I feel about the heads... I think they're kinda ugly. eric (24 years ago, 22-Oct-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: New sets for 2001... finally (Pictures) —Adam Myers
|
| | | | | | | (...) minute (...) Lucas to do a new space line. Hopefully this won't be cut after one season. It looks to be really promising. If the sets are as good as the pictures, I'll think about taking back everything bad that I've said abotu TLG in the last (...) (24 years ago, 22-Oct-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: New sets for 2001... finally (Pictures) —Trevor Pruden
|
| | | | | | | OMG! Was it good for all of you too? Eric...many many many thanks! Now I know how to set my budget. I just want to comment on some of these sets: (...) Air pump? An original idea, but I don't know if I'm going to like this big air pump getting in (...) (24 years ago, 22-Oct-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: New sets for 2001... finally (Pictures) —Bradley Dale
|
| | | | | | | | (...) I thought it was translucent orange. (...) I think it is in the $35-45 range. (24 years ago, 22-Oct-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: New sets for 2001... finally (Pictures) —Trevor Pruden
|
| | | | | | | | It's hard to tell because the picture is fuzzy. I can't see how they would make the wall translucent orange, just to have a blue window. I guess I'll have to wait and see. That's ok because it won't be my first purchase. Trev (...) . (24 years ago, 22-Oct-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: New sets for 2001... finally (Pictures) —Bradley Dale
|
| | | | | | | | They would make it the same way they made the trans orange walls for the Mystic Mountain Time Lab. I don't think it would be that difficult. (...) (24 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: New sets for 2001... finally (Pictures) —Timothy Jones
|
| | | | | | | (...) new (...) very (...) minute (...) have this year's town in the catalog? Or did you just not mention it?... (24 years ago, 22-Oct-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: New sets for 2001... finally (Pictures) —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | | (...) --Todd (24 years ago, 22-Oct-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.robotics, lugnet.year.2001)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: New sets for 2001... finally (Pictures) —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Huh? What's "LMS VCS"? Steve (24 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.year.2001)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: New sets for 2001... finally (Pictures) —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | | | (...) _L_EGO _M_IND_S_TORMS _V_ision _C_ommand _S_ystem. :-) --Todd (24 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.year.2001)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: New sets for 2001... finally (Pictures) —Kenneth Wright
|
| | | | | | | The Imperial Shuttle looks awesome! Thank you, Eric, for this wonderful preview - and for taking the time to scan the pics. for all of us to see. I am disapointed that there wasn't anything new to the LEGO Train theme as of yet, but that is no fault (...) (24 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: New sets for 2001... finally (Pictures) —Bradley Dale
|
| | | | | | | | There could be Train- TLC hardly ever puts S@H exclusives in the little booklets. There were about 7 Train sets released in 1999, but the booklet only showed the one sold in stores. I hope they release a train car for transporting animlals soon, (...) (24 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: New sets for 2001... finally (Pictures) —Scott Thomas
|
| | | | | | | | (...) What about a Barnum and Bailey circus train? :p Scott (24 years ago, 27-Oct-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: New sets for 2001... finally (Pictures) —Mark Sandlin
|
| | | | | | | *ahem* <soapbox> TIE FIGHTER LASERS ARE SUPPOSED TO BE GREEN!!!!! </soapbox> Thank you. ~Mark (24 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: New sets for 2001... finally (Pictures) —Trevor Pruden
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Details details details... ;) (24 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Mickey Sculpture (was:New sets for 2001...) —Jeff Boen
|
| | | | | | I don't suppose you have created a .DAT for your mickey sculpture? My girlfriend is going nuts for it! :) J (24 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | What about City/Town? —Christian Gemuenden
|
| | | | | Well, I didn't expect to see any cool town sets, but there are not even new ugly City ones! Does TLC now discontinue the entire Twon line??? *Here's hope for a classic town in 2001-2* THANX for the scans (at (URL) ) Bye, Christian --- xTI@N. LUGNet (...) (24 years ago, 22-Oct-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: What about City/Town? —Gary Istok
|
| | | | | | I would hope that Town has not been discontinued! It has been the mainstay of LEGO since 1955, when the "TOWN PLAN" system was introduced. This was LEGO's only system until 1963 (when the Architectural System made its short lived appearance). Gary (...) (24 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: What about City/Town? —Timothy Jones
|
| | | | | | | (...) Don't forget, this could be an incomplete catalog. I dont see why TLC would discontinue town. But with the way they're going so far from their original standards, I wouldn't be too surprised...But then, MAYBE in 2002, juniorization will be (...) (24 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: What about City/Town? —Timothy Jones
|
| | | | | | (...) Don't forget, this could be an incomplete catalog. I dont see why TLC would discontinue town. But with the way they're going so far from their original standards these days, I wouldn't be too surprised...But then, MAYBE in 2002, juniorization (...) (24 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: New sets for 2001... finally —Aaron West
|
| | | | | (...) found: (...) Well Eric, Thank you for this great post! Looks like Town went out with a whimper. Maybe it'll come back after a while looking lots better... If this information and the photos get any clearer, I think my 2001 LEGO budget may go (...) (24 years ago, 22-Oct-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: New sets for 2001... finally —Kevin Zwicker
|
| | | | | | In lugnet.general, Aaron West writes: <Snip> (...) <Snip> (...) I'm hoping for a mid-year release with a return to classic or semi-classic Town sets. I'll keep my fingers crossed! Kev Z #142 (24 years ago, 22-Oct-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: New sets for 2001... finally —Bradley Dale
|
| | | | | (...) found: (...) "4+" taking the place of "6+" seems to imply "extremely juniorized". The pictures are too blurry to tell though. The blue humanoids are improbable, but I still want one. The family is cute. I don't feel the need to get any of the (...) (24 years ago, 22-Oct-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: New sets for 2001... finally —Kevin Zwicker
|
| | | | | | | In lugnet.general, Bradley Dale writes: <Snip> (...) I would only consider it a victory if TLC releases some Town "Senior" sets later in 2001 or 2002. If Town has gone the way of the Pirates, I will be raiding stores to pick up everything they have (...) (24 years ago, 22-Oct-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.town)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: New sets for 2001... finally —Bradley Dale
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Give them time. If it really turned out bad, we could all mail TLC letters requesting the return of Town on the same day, and it would look like a huge thing. And if that doesn't work, just use parts from other themes to make Town stuff. (...) (...) (24 years ago, 22-Oct-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.town)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: New sets for 2001... finally —Rose Regner
|
| | | | | | Bradley Dale wrote in message ... (...) there's (...) I hope so, else this is going to be a VERY disappointing year for Lego. Only the Star Wars sets are any good. Rose What ever happened to Lego attracting more girls, I am still waiting!!!!!! (24 years ago, 22-Oct-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: New sets for 2001... finally —Rene Virsik
|
| | | | | | | And what about some new Modelteams or UCS models ??? Or new Developer Kits ??? LEGO, LEGO.... ;(( Bye. Rene (24 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.modelteam)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: New sets for 2001... finally —Tom Stangl
|
| | | | | | Oh, I don't know, Technic is pretty good - the Silver Champion ROCKS (I can't BELIEVE I've had one for almost a month and still haven't built it! Shows how busy I've been). The Power Puller is going to bankrupt me, I'll need at least 3. And at least (...) (24 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: New sets for 2001... finally —Bradley Dale
|
| | | | | | (...) We were talking about 2001 being juniorized. 2000 is good. (...) (24 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: New sets for 2001... finally —Tom Stangl
|
| | | | | | Yeah, well, considering that the Power Puller still isn't really available anywhere (I haven't seen it locally), as far as I'm concerned, it's a 2001 set ;-) (...) -- | Tom Stangl, Technical Support Netscape Communications Corp | Please do not (...) (24 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: New sets for 2001... finally —Rose Regner
|
| | | | | Where do you live? Rose Eric Lanteigne wrote in message ... (...) new (...) found: (...) very (...) attention) (...) (24 years ago, 22-Oct-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Official Names and US Prices —Bradley Dale
|
| | | | | I guess its okay to put these back on Lugnet now. (...) found: (...) Moving Background $60 (...) Explosion Studio $30 (...) Car Stunt Studio $20 (...) Adventure Scene $6 (...) Aero Tube Hangar $100 (...) Monojet $3 (...) Red Planet Cruiser $6 (...) (...) (24 years ago, 22-Oct-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Official Names and US Prices —Richard W. Schamus
|
| | | | | | (...) Of course it is ok to reference an official pamphlet from a set. What is not OK, is to reference information gained through unofficial means, like from a TRU shipping form, or something like that. When it was taken off (what was it, a month (...) (24 years ago, 25-Oct-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Official Names and US Prices —Jason Rowoldt
|
| | | | | | Rich, you don't have to answer this, as I know you have an employer who will not like what I write below and you might not want to comment on it. :) Why SHOULDN'T we be able to make references to insider/strangely obtained information here? This (...) (24 years ago, 27-Oct-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: New sets for 2001... finally —Chuck Rex
|
| | | | (...) Town is Dead!! Long live town... (24 years ago, 25-Oct-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.town)
|
| | | | |
