Subject:
|
Re: The proliferation of fests: Good or bad?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.events
|
Date:
|
Mon, 11 Dec 2006 19:59:15 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3286 times
|
| |
| |
In lugnet.events, Jeramy Spurgeon wrote:
|
I believe it means: Non LEGO Significant Other.
-Jeramy
|
Oooooooooooooh. Well that makes sense I guess.
I rather like this topic as it has been on my mind as well. The question I have
is whether or not some fests have become too much expo and not enough
convention. By this I mean, are we putting on shows at great expense to
ourselves or are we glady paying money to go hang out with other people we enjoy
being around.
Both expo and convention can exist side by side, but Im curious where the
balance is and are some events more interested in expo than they are in
convention and vice versa. I hope this doesnt open a can of worms, but Im
truly interested in yalls thoughts.
Steve
|
|
Message has 1 Reply: | | Re: The proliferation of fests: Good or bad?
|
| (...) Steve- I think this is a very good point and some of us have certainly discussed it before. A public expo provides: A chance to show off creations to a big crowd Opportunity to spread the word about LEGO A bigger market for vendors An (...) (18 years ago, 12-Dec-06, to lugnet.events, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
36 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|