Subject:
|
Re: The proliferation of fests: Good or bad?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.events
|
Date:
|
Mon, 11 Dec 2006 15:28:40 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3047 times
|
| |
|
|
At 09:45 AM 12/11/06, Bruce Hietbrink wrote:
> I actually have not yet been to a fest, so perhaps my input means
> less here, but
> I'm all for having multiple fests each year.
Why haven't you attended a fest?
Seriously.
Is it time? Location? Money? While more events doesn't help with
the money, (except for cutting down travel-expenses), it can help
with the correct time, or better location. As you said, these may
vary from one person to another.
Steve
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: The proliferation of fests: Good or bad?
|
| (...) It's been a combination of location and a NLSO. Now that I live in DC, hopefully I will be able to get to the next BF, if only for the public exposition. In the past when I was not near a fest, it's kind of hard to say "Well, honey, I love you (...) (18 years ago, 11-Dec-06, to lugnet.events)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: The proliferation of fests: Good or bad?
|
| I actually have not yet been to a fest, so perhaps my input means less here, but I'm all for having multiple fests each year. To me it comes down to a simple question - do we have the same group of people, now diluted over multiple fests (and (...) (18 years ago, 11-Dec-06, to lugnet.events, FTX)
|
36 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
