Subject:
|
Re: Question How do we know if Brad is for real?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.dear-lego
|
Date:
|
Sat, 1 Jan 2000 17:36:18 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3752 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.dear-lego, Tim Courtney writes:
> On Sat, 1 Jan 2000 09:45:23 GMT, "Doyle" <doylenelson@home.com> wrote:
>
> [snipped a very witty reply by David Kadansky]
>
> > I suspected that someone would comment like this. I meant no offence when I
> > posted, and auctually I find your comments childish.
>
> And your skepticism was not?
I think neither one was childish - Doyle was just checking, while David (I
think) was trying to make a point, mainly that you never know anything in this
uncertain world, sometimes you just have to believe...
>
> > At least my questions
> > were sincere and not sarcastic. I dont know how long you have been with the
> > group, you may have been with them a long time. Since I mainly saty in the
> > castle area and posts our paths might have never met. Just that I dont
> > remember you from the RTL years ago, so I am assuming you are new?
>
> I've never encountered David either, on RTL in years past or here on
> Lugnet. It doesn't necessarily mean he is new, its just that we
> haven't crossed paths before.
And if he is new, so what? Does that make him less qualified for an opinion?
> > Who knows
> > or cares. I just find that this group has always been friendly and polite
> > and
> > that lately things are starting to change here, especially since most of us
> > left rtl due to the wise and sarcastic rude people that kept posting
> > garbage.
>
> For the most part it is, and hopefully it will stay this way.
Yep. I don't think David was rude or sarcastic, just making a point by showing
the extremety of the other point of view. (you can't really say he's
sarcastic - he might have been joking.)
> > I'm sure you meant no offence, and I know my previous post couldn't have
> > caused any offence,
>
> You do not know that for a fact. From Brad's history of posting here,
> and the fact that this question has come up before, and from his own
> statements saying that he cannot reply to every single message and
> would like to read them all, it could have caused him offence.
> Contrary to popular belief, TLC employees are people too.
Really? I wasn't sure ;-) (1)
[snipped]
Doyle, I don't think David meant to be rude (maybe he did, but I don't see it
that way). Hope that makes things clearer,
-Shiri
(1) Was that rude? Sarcastic? I'm sorry, it was meant to be a *joke*.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Question How do we know if Brad is for real?
|
| (...) But I see taking it to this extreme after many people have come up with evidence in Brad's defense childish. (...) You're absolutely right. I guess I was too tired when I posted after getting less than 2 hours of sleep before to word it that (...) (27 years ago, 1-Jan-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Question How do we know if Brad is for real?
|
| On Sat, 1 Jan 2000 09:45:23 GMT, "Doyle" <doylenelson@home.com> wrote: [snipped a very witty reply by David Kadansky] (...) And your skepticism was not? (...) I've never encountered David either, on RTL in years past or here on Lugnet. It doesn't (...) (27 years ago, 1-Jan-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
33 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
