Subject:
|
Re: Question How do we know if Brad is for real?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.dear-lego
|
Date:
|
Sat, 1 Jan 2000 22:25:21 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
[mattdm@]IHateSpam[mattdm.org]
|
Viewed:
|
1451 times
|
| |
|
|
Larry Pieniazek <lar@voyager.net> wrote:
> One more question which I think is still begging an answer: What
> specifically can WE do to help? Harken back a few days and you'll recall
> I suggested that Brad give us some specific questions to brainstorm on.
> That hasn't happened, and I am disappointed.
That is true. But on the other hand, that was right before Christmas, and
that seems an unfair time to expect immediate replies from anyone....
--
Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Question How do we know if Brad is for real?
|
| (...) I have work e-mail that I'm not going to bother responding to until I get back to the office on Monday.... (not that I'm neglecting my duties - my entire university is closed right now, so responding to the e-mail would be a little silly since (...) (25 years ago, 3-Jan-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Question How do we know if Brad is for real?
|
| Doyle, I think David's point is, how do we know anything with 100% certainty? Without going too deeply into epistimology (we HAVE done just that on off-topic.debate, you could review it if you're interested) I'd claim that we know things in general (...) (25 years ago, 1-Jan-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
33 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
