To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.dear-legoOpen lugnet.dear-lego in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Dear LEGO / 1212
1211  |  1213
Subject: 
Re: Question How do we know if Brad is for real?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.dear-lego
Date: 
Sun, 2 Jan 2000 01:29:17 GMT
Viewed: 
3941 times
  
In lugnet.dear-lego, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> Doyle wrote:
> 
> > Thanks Lar,
> > 
> > I didn't know todd said he was A ok. Thats fine with me if Todd checked it • out
> > and found him to be true.
> 
> Todd didn't come out and say so in so many words in a post here, but if
> Todd had doubts about his bonafides Todd would never have approved his
> posting privileges. Those are the dots I connected, and those dots were
> there for you or anyone else to connect as well.
> 
> > Thanks agian, But Lar, do you think he was being sarcastic? Because I do.
> 
> I don't want to go there. Maybe he was. Maybe he wasn't. Maybe you just
> read something into it that wasn't there. It's too easy to go off
> quickly on one or two posts if you don't have the background. For
> instance, someone who had never met you, after reading a post or two,
> might dismiss you out of hand as illiterate and ungrammatical, because
> you tend to write hurridly, you miscapitalize stuff, you spell things
> incorrectly, you leave out punctuation, etc. etc. etc... But that would
> be incorrect. I know you have reasons for what you do and I'm not going
> to make snap judgements.
> 
> It is better to assume no offense was intended, when reading the works
> of others, and it is better to write one's own words to be certain that
> only deliberate offense was given. (note the distinction... if I
> intended to give offense, I'd believe you'd know)
> 
> Doyle, I'd suggest letting this whole thing go. And if we need to
> continue it, let's do it somewhere else, like off-topic.debate...

I agree. I do feel bad that I continued this discussion on this thread which
should have been placed somewhere else. I do apologize. :) As for the Grammer
well your right, I do write quick and I am fortunate to find my mistakes at
all, much less correct them. Of course those were strong words.

I won't reply on this subject again.

Doyle



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Question How do we know if Brad is for real?
 
(...) Todd didn't come out and say so in so many words in a post here, but if Todd had doubts about his bonafides Todd would never have approved his posting privileges. Those are the dots I connected, and those dots were there for you or anyone else (...) (27 years ago, 2-Jan-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)

33 Messages in This Thread:














Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR