Subject:
|
Re: Parts with odd angles
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Thu, 15 Jul 1999 13:32:40 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1180 times
|
| |
|
|
On Thu, 15 Jul 1999 03:32:29 GMT, legoverse@geocities.com (Terry K) wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Jul 1999 13:48:14 GMT, "John VanZwieten"
> <john_vanzwieten@email.msn.com> wrote:
>
> > Wouldn't it at least make sense to put the angle in the description where
> > possible? Most new LDrawers probably wouldn't think (or know how) to look in
> > the part header. Just adding "15Deg" wouldn't make most part names too long.
>
> That *might* work. What does everyone think?
> We need to standardize it, whatever we do.
> The reason I would use the 'KEYWORDS' is because those do show up in the
> Anders' ldlist program.
It makes sense on some parts, not on others. It would fit in well with the
Technic Angle Connectors, not so well with the minifig drill.
Speaking of the drill, something should be done with the minifig hand,
which has an incorrect angle at the wrist. Just to make things more
complicated.
> > Here's a radical thought: change "Technic" to "Tech" for the whole category,
> > giving an extra 3 characters to work with.
>
> Maybe. Opinions?
It's not worth messing up the Technic to get the three characters.
> > I just had the same experience with the minifig tool drill, rotating it to fit
> > in a minifig's hand.
>
> I've done that as well.
Due to safety concerns, please be sure the drill is unplugged before
mounting.
Steve
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Parts with odd angles
|
| (...) That *might* work. What does everyone think? We need to standardize it, whatever we do. The reason I would use the 'KEYWORDS' is because those do show up in the Anders' ldlist program. (...) Maybe. Opinions? (...) I've done that as well. -- (...) (26 years ago, 15-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
31 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
