Subject:
|
Re: Parts with odd angles
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Thu, 15 Jul 1999 11:39:11 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1124 times
|
| |
|
|
legoverse@geocities.com (Terry K) writes:
> On Wed, 14 Jul 1999 13:48:14 GMT, "John VanZwieten"
> <john_vanzwieten@email.msn.com> wrote:
>
> > Wouldn't it at least make sense to put the angle in the description
> > where possible? Most new LDrawers probably wouldn't think (or know
> > how) to look in the part header. Just adding "15Deg" wouldn't make
> > most part names too long.
>
> That *might* work. What does everyone think? We need to standardize
> it, whatever we do.
In my opinion, adding "15Deg" or whatever to the end of the description
sounds standardized enough for me. But I'm probably not experienced
enough with LDraw to tell.
> > Here's a radical thought: change "Technic" to "Tech" for the whole
> > category, giving an extra 3 characters to work with.
>
> Maybe. Opinions?
Personally, I don't like it. I don't think the conversion from
"Technic" to "Tech" worth the extra three characters gained. But that's
just my subjective opinion.
Fredrik
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Parts with odd angles
|
| (...) What about removing some items from "Technic"? Like make some new categories, such as axles, beams, and gears? Personally I think the "Technic" category is to big and varied. Motors and battery boxes and such could go into electric, and misc. (...) (25 years ago, 15-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Parts with odd angles
|
| (...) That *might* work. What does everyone think? We need to standardize it, whatever we do. The reason I would use the 'KEYWORDS' is because those do show up in the Anders' ldlist program. (...) Maybe. Opinions? (...) I've done that as well. -- (...) (25 years ago, 15-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
31 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
