Subject:
|
Re: LDraw-to-Raves (was: POV in Part)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dat.parts
|
Date:
|
Tue, 15 Jul 2003 21:00:40 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1839 times
|
| |
|
|
Just to drop in my 2 cents,
I think putting them into one file would be better.
Also, could you put up a quality comparison chart? Three shots of a couple of
parts, each, so we can compare?
Thanks,
Mike
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: LDraw-to-Raves (was: POV in Part)
|
| (...) I'm torn - using a single file in POV-Ray is definitely more convenient, and 750 definitions don't seem to be too much overhead for the parsing engine to chew on. But for (later) updates to the wrapper library, individual files would work (...) (21 years ago, 16-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
| | | Re: LDraw-to-Raves (was: POV in Part)
|
| "Michael Horvath" <mhorvath2161@juno.com> wrote in message news:HI33p4.1w9H@lugnet.com... (...) Isn't very flexible, is it? (...) couple of (...) Before you go and render, think of this: LDraw: rectangles and triangles that make up lego parts, (...) (21 years ago, 17-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | LDraw-to-Raves (was: POV in Part)
|
| (...) OK, I've generated a complete translation list, matching up as many parts from Anton's library to LDraw as possible. I also worked through the colors/textures/materials, making as many matches as I could. I've started creating POV-Ray include (...) (21 years ago, 25-Jun-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
42 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
