Subject:
|
Re: LDraw-to-Raves (was: POV in Part)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dat.parts
|
Date:
|
Sun, 20 Jul 2003 16:05:56 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2226 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Paul Easter wrote:
> Something like this?
> http://www.geocities.com/pneaster/lego_parts_rev.htm
> (Please do not use the part files from there, most of them have been updated on
> the Parts Tracker. The helmet is changing origin)
YES YES YES! Cool stuff, Paul.
C'mon guys open your eyes and look at this:
http://www.geocities.com/pneaster/lego_stuff/2446pov.jpg
LDRAW helmet (very good part writing I must say, I couldn't have done it) 500+
lines. And by adding (just) 36 lines of POV code one gets a real rounded
helmet.
Now, what's the problem?
Jeroen
|
|
Message has 3 Replies:
 | | Re: LDraw-to-Raves (was: POV in Part)
|
| (...) For one, I'm not keen on putting POV-Ray code in LDraw part files. Besides complicating the review/certification process, it also ties the LDraw library to one specific renderer, in an official way. Steve (21 years ago, 24-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
| | | Re: LDraw-to-Raves (was: POV in Part)
|
| (...) Perhaps things like this could be included in the category/list of other .dat libraries that will some day be on LDraw.org. People could go to the respective sites to download POV enhanced parts. Just my $0.02 --Ryan (URL) (21 years ago, 25-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: LDraw-to-Raves (was: POV in Part)
|
| (...) I think the 1:1 aproach would be better. Using one main include file might be convienient, but makes it difficult for many authors to contribute to. (...) Something like this? (URL) do not use the part files from there, most of them have been (...) (21 years ago, 17-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
42 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
