Subject:
|
Re: LDraw-to-Raves (was: POV in Part)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dat.parts
|
Date:
|
Thu, 24 Jul 2003 12:44:23 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
5912 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Anton Raves wrote:
> I partially agree here, it may not be very flexible but it is better for file
> systems that use minimal cluster sizes... ;-)
Good point.
As I wrote in another post, we could keep the individual part files on a
dev server, and distribute a single combined file. Or store all the
individual definitions in a SQL database.
> Yes, I'm currently updating and refining my library, a new test version 024
> should be available somewhere today, containing over 450 pieces redone and
> checked. That leaves me about 330 pieces still to check but they will get done
> in the near future, new bricks have been added as well.
Ack! I better post my work soon, or it will be horribly out-of-date! ;)
Steve
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: LDraw-to-Raves (was: POV in Part)
|
| (...) I partially agree here, it may not be very flexible but it is better for file systems that use minimal cluster sizes... ;-) (...) Jeroen, I know what I want, and that is renders that look good. Of course us still not having an MLCAD-like (...) (23 years ago, 20-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
42 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
