Subject:
|
Re: POV in Part
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dat.parts
|
Date:
|
Sat, 21 Jun 2003 16:08:03 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2134 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Lars C. Hassing wrote:
> but which library to use, I think will depend on the preference of POV coding style
> of the coming POV part authors, LGEO style or Anton Raves style.
Are there any significant differences between the two libraries? I
assume they both use solid modeling, not surface modeling. I don't
think either library offers rounded edges on bricks (something I still
miss from the L3G0 library).
I've only looked at Anton's library long enough to figure out the
dimensions, and to look up random parts. It doesn't appear to use many
macros; each part is written mostly independently.
Steve
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: POV in Part
|
| (...) My library is currently being rebuild and all buttons on the bricks are getting a selectable rounded edge, they take up a whole extra amount of rendering time so I've made them an option. Also, I've always looked at new Lego(TM) and there are (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: POV in Part
|
| (...) Yes, L3P would automatically support new LGEO parts if they were added to the binary l2p_elmt.tab. (...) You can use the -d option to L3P to see the contents of LGEO's *.TAB files: l3p -d -lgeo somefile.dat | more (mentioned a couple of years (...) (21 years ago, 11-Jun-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
42 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
