Subject:
|
Re: More newbie questions
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Fri, 18 Aug 2000 17:15:34 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
(jsproat@io)antispam(.com)
|
Viewed:
|
841 times
|
| |
|
|
Steve Bliss wrote:
> Anybody feel like building a ldraw.reg file, to set up standard stuff for
> DAT and MPD? Besides the browser-stuff, I'd love to be able to right-click
> DAT files, and have my choice of LDraw/LEdit/LDLite/L3Lab/LDGLite/TextPad,
> etc., etc.
The obvious issue I can see with this is the path to the executables. In
some cases, simply having the .exe in the path is good enough, but I
understand there are problems with this. I anyone willing to test a .reg
file I just built?
Cheers,
- jsproat
--
Jeremy H. Sproat <jsproat@io.com> ~~~ http://www.io.com/~jsproat/
Is it still illegal if I copy just the FBI warning?
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: More newbie questions
|
| (...) Just having a .reg that I can tinker with (inserting my own path info) would be very cool! Different people may have different wants/needs in regards to the 'default' application for DAT and MPD. This almost begs for a "LDraw Registration" (...) (24 years ago, 21-Aug-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: More newbie questions
|
| (...) Anybody feel like building a ldraw.reg file, to set up standard stuff for DAT and MPD? Besides the browser-stuff, I'd love to be able to right-click DAT files, and have my choice of LDraw/LEdit/LDLite/L...e/TextPad, etc., etc. Steve (24 years ago, 17-Aug-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
26 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
