Subject:
|
Re: More newbie questions
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Thu, 17 Aug 2000 16:48:12 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
574 times
|
| |
|
|
Sure, I organize things by directory. And with the new file viewers/modeling
programs that's no problem, as they can still find everything OK (mostly).
The only problem is with LDraw and LEdit, which are "dumb" and need the models
to be in a pre-ordained place - unless you specifically specify(1) directory
paths within the .dat file. Which, in general, is not a good idea to do.
-- Terry K --
1. 'specifically specify' - is that grammatically allowable? Sounds and looks
odd to me.
> > Tim Courtney wrote:
> Which brings me to some ideas I was going to use to organize all the DAT
> files I have, both mine and others'
>
> When I put the whole LDraw shebang back on my PC (today sounds like a good
> day!), I'm going to organize files to kill the pileup in the standard
> models/ folder. A year or more ago, someone suggested a models/authors/
> dir - which I have in place, and now I think I'll move everything to. Then
> I'll go further than that and make subdirs for each creation, keeping dat
> files out of the way of each other.
>
> I wonder if anyone has done this before?
> --
>
> Tim Courtney - tim@zacktron.com
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: More newbie questions
|
| "Sproaticus" <jsproat@io.com> wrote in message news:399C0CBF.901134...@io.com... (...) this, (...) type (...) Alrighty. (...) save (...) No, I wouldn't. But I haven't run across a case yet where I have. (...) Which brings me to some ideas I was (...) (24 years ago, 17-Aug-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
26 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
