Subject:
|
Re: More newbie questions
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Mon, 21 Aug 2000 14:03:35 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
808 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Sproaticus wrote:
> Steve Bliss wrote:
> > Anybody feel like building a ldraw.reg file, to set up standard stuff for
> > DAT and MPD? Besides the browser-stuff, I'd love to be able to right-click
> > DAT files, and have my choice of LDraw/LEdit/LDLite/L3Lab/LDGLite/TextPad,
> > etc., etc.
>
> The obvious issue I can see with this is the path to the executables. In
> some cases, simply having the .exe in the path is good enough, but I
> understand there are problems with this.
Just having a .reg that I can tinker with (inserting my own path info)
would be very cool!
Different people may have different wants/needs in regards to the 'default'
application for DAT and MPD. This almost begs for a "LDraw Registration"
utility program.
> I[s] anyone willing to test a .reg file I just built?
I'm willing to test it! Please, can I? :)
Steve
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: More newbie questions
|
| (...) Grrr... Shiri's been stealing my letters again! :-, (...) I simply hacked this stuff into the L3Lab settings. I'm not sure what the "EditFlags" values do, but it should be noted that this value doesn't exist on the default action... Anyway, (...) (25 years ago, 21-Aug-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: More newbie questions
|
| (...) The obvious issue I can see with this is the path to the executables. In some cases, simply having the .exe in the path is good enough, but I understand there are problems with this. I anyone willing to test a .reg file I just built? Cheers, - (...) (25 years ago, 18-Aug-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
26 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
