Subject:
|
Re: [LDAO] Editor Feedback requested
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Fri, 20 Nov 1998 21:53:37 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2272 times
|
| |
|
|
> Yes, unfortunately. :( And it gets us right back to the "88 ways to
> connect LEGO elements" discussion.
I'd say there are infinitely many ways to attach two parts - rotations
and sliding a plate between a row of studs are two infinites. I don't
know how you'd handle this- maybe a snap connection with an override
capability?
> Which reminds me. Thanks to Mr. Stangl & his guitars, we have a new
> connection method:
>
> female-hinge-finger sliding connection to grille tile
>
> Steve
>
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: [LDAO] Editor Feedback requested
|
| (...) Make the "hotspot" for the connection a line, and allow the pieces to slide along the line. For rods (like flagpoles), the "hotspot" would also allow rotation. Some sliding connections would allow pieces to slide off the end (like an axle (...) (26 years ago, 23-Nov-98, to lugnet.cad)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: [LDAO] Editor Feedback requested
|
| (...) Wow. That could mean hundreds of step-images, for large models at least. (...) True. I can think of two approaches of the top of my head (use math to do 3D hit-testing, or build a part-bitmap during rendering, and lookup the clicked pixel in (...) (26 years ago, 19-Nov-98, to lugnet.cad)
|
25 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
