Subject:
|
Re: 2 x Armada Flagship = Armada Warship
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.terms
|
Date:
|
Tue, 4 Jul 2000 11:40:57 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
6046 times
|
| |
| |
In lugnet.admin.terms, Frank Filz writes:
>
> Larry Pieniazek wrote in message ...
> > In lugnet.admin.terms, Frank Filz writes:
> > > Chiding people about breaking rules that aren't
> >
> > yet (inserted by Lar)
> >
> > > rules is rather poor form.
> >
> > I forgot about that! EXCELLENT point, Frank. Smacks of vigilantism and of
> > enforcing mores that aren't actually in effect (which phenomenon I am quite
> > familiar with, living in Grand Rapids as I do, but I digress).
>
>
> I like to keep people honest :-)
>
> I sincerely hope that the new TOU get resolved pretty soon. It seems to me that the flaming about perceived rules breaking is
> getting worse (over the past couple months, I don't think any discussion of misplaced auction posts has occurred, but there sure has
> been a lot about other types of market posts which are currently allowed in any group so long as they relate to that groups purpose
> (since the rules currently don't even include a recommendation against such
postings).
I have not seen too much of this - but I suppose I have not really been looking
for it. I suppose if it is difficult to know if people are upset by the post
itself, or the perceived rule breaking - or perhaps both. Personally, I have no
gripe against interesting sales (large lots / rare items), but common/dull
items are just noise IMHO. In any event, there is no real way of really knowing
what people, as a whole, feel on this - or if what they do feel is compatible
with Todd's long term aims for this webspace.
>
> I also hope that the new rules will make it clear about plugs in sigs, and I'm
beginning to feel that blatant market plugs in sigs
> should also not be allowed since I can see similar discussion occurring. Of
course if the people who would pursue vigilante justice
> (thanks for suggesting that word - so far, Todd has not deputized anyone to be
cops) would make an effort to understand the rules,
> we wouldn't have these flames....
I expect the web interface to become more and more dominant. So, unless Todd
spends some time on it, signatures will become laborious cut and paste affairs.
Personally, I like signatures (market or otherwise) - they are often the most
interesting part of the post :-)
Scott A
>
> Frank
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: 2 x Armada Flagship = Armada Warship
|
| Larry Pieniazek wrote in message ... (...) I like to keep people honest :-) I sincerely hope that the new TOU get resolved pretty soon. It seems to me that the flaming about perceived rules breaking is getting worse (over the past couple months, I (...) (24 years ago, 3-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
27 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|