Subject:
|
Re: 2 x Armada Flagship = Armada Warship
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.terms
|
Date:
|
Sun, 2 Jul 2000 03:02:07 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
6004 times
|
| |
|
|
Todd Lehman wrote in message ...
> In lugnet.admin.terms, Kevin Wilson writes:
> > [...]
> > on the "flogs in theme groups" long running discussion, I found a notice
> > from Todd back in April that a change to teh TOS was to be forthcoming
> > on the subject, but I couldn't find any actual announcement. Did the TOS
> > change actually happen? Todd?
>
> It hasn't happened yet, no -- partially due to time and partially due to a few
> borderline examples that happened in April and May which confuse the issue.
> It's still the intention to adjust the TOU to keep blatant non-auction flogs
> out of the theme groups, but certainly it isn't the intention of the TOU to
> restrict people from describing models they have for sale, if the descriptions
> are honest contributions to the theme and describe things of interest to the
> group they're in rather than being a pure flog.
Also, I assume references to market sites in ones sigs will still be allowed assuming the sig itself is of reasonable size.
One thought for Kevin and future posters of something like this, the post would be much less questionable if a few words were said
about how the creation was made, or its special features. This type of discussion adds to the theme value, and makes the post meaty
enough that the market reference in the sig is an aside rather than perhaps appearing to be the purpose of the post.
I also again encourage people who have concerns with posts to discuss them privately with the poster and/or Todd (assuming Todd
doesn't want to countermand such). It reduces the possibility of raising tempers. Of course at some point, open discussion is
valuable, but especially until Todd actually changes the TOU to disallow any market posting outside of market (and org and any other
specifically welcoming) groups, I wish people would refrain from raising the issue. Chiding people about breaking rules that aren't
rules is rather poor form (now some of the gentle "you will probably get a better response if you post to
lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade" posts are more acceptable, but it still would probably be better as a private e-mail).
Frank
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: 2 x Armada Flagship = Armada Warship
|
| (...) yet (inserted by Lar) (...) I forgot about that! EXCELLENT point, Frank. Smacks of vigilantism and of enforcing mores that aren't actually in effect (which phenomenon I am quite familiar with, living in Grand Rapids as I do, but I digress). (...) (24 years ago, 3-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: 2 x Armada Flagship = Armada Warship
|
| (...) It hasn't happened yet, no -- partially due to time and partially due to a few borderline examples that happened in April and May which confuse the issue. It's still the intention to adjust the TOU to keep blatant non-auction flogs out of the (...) (24 years ago, 29-Jun-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
27 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
