Subject:
|
Re: 2 x Armada Flagship = Armada Warship
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.terms
|
Date:
|
Fri, 30 Jun 2000 06:37:10 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
5992 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.terms, Todd Lehman writes:
> In lugnet.admin.terms, Kevin Wilson writes:
> > [...]
> > on the "flogs in theme groups" long running discussion, I found a notice
> > from Todd back in April that a change to teh TOS was to be forthcoming
> > on the subject, but I couldn't find any actual announcement. Did the TOS
> > change actually happen? Todd?
>
> It hasn't happened yet, no -- partially due to time and partially due to a few
> borderline examples that happened in April and May which confuse the issue.
> It's still the intention to adjust the TOU to keep blatant non-auction flogs
> out of the theme groups, but certainly it isn't the intention of the TOU to
> restrict people from describing models they have for sale, if the descriptions
> are honest contributions to the theme and describe things of interest to the
> group they're in rather than being a pure flog.
>
> --Todd
So how would you "grade" this one?
I see it as a big contribution to the theme group and not at all a flog. Eric,
I think, sees it rather more like pure flog with little or no redeeming value.
Some specific guidance from you, since you're the one and only enforcer of
rules, might be helpful. That's not to say that the general principles you
enumerate aren't useful, but the problem with subjective gradients is, of
course, that they are subjective. We need more data points on your thresholds,
perhaps.
To Eric: One thing I gleaned from your replies to Jude (and I agree with you,
thrash this out, it's good to discuss, even if you happen to be wrong about the
issue itself :-) ) is that the order that stuff was posted was part of the
problem?
Had it been posted in the other order (to pirates first, then to
marketplace) it would have been OK?
That seems unsupportable. The order posted and the order read have only a weak
correlation.
++Lar (gotta run, checkpoint prep still to do)
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: 2 x Armada Flagship = Armada Warship
|
| (...) Ah... hmmm. First, as I tried to hint to you earlier, I don't really think that this post was necessarily nothing but a blatant flog. I did think it raised an interesting point to debate, though, because it would be easy to flog in this manner (...) (24 years ago, 3-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: 2 x Armada Flagship = Armada Warship
|
| (...) It hasn't happened yet, no -- partially due to time and partially due to a few borderline examples that happened in April and May which confuse the issue. It's still the intention to adjust the TOU to keep blatant non-auction flogs out of the (...) (24 years ago, 29-Jun-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
27 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
