Subject:
|
Re: 2 x Armada Flagship = Armada Warship
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.terms
|
Date:
|
Mon, 3 Jul 2000 17:49:15 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
6065 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.terms, Frank Filz writes:
> Chiding people about breaking rules that aren't
yet (inserted by Lar)
> rules is rather poor form.
I forgot about that! EXCELLENT point, Frank. Smacks of vigilantism and of
enforcing mores that aren't actually in effect (which phenomenon I am quite
familiar with, living in Grand Rapids as I do, but I digress).
++Lar
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: 2 x Armada Flagship = Armada Warship
|
| Larry Pieniazek wrote in message ... (...) I like to keep people honest :-) I sincerely hope that the new TOU get resolved pretty soon. It seems to me that the flaming about perceived rules breaking is getting worse (over the past couple months, I (...) (24 years ago, 3-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: 2 x Armada Flagship = Armada Warship
|
| Todd Lehman wrote in message ... (...) Also, I assume references to market sites in ones sigs will still be allowed assuming the sig itself is of reasonable size. One thought for Kevin and future posters of something like this, the post would be (...) (24 years ago, 2-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
27 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
