To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.termsOpen lugnet.admin.terms in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / Terms of Use / 125
124  |  126
Subject: 
Re: 2 x Armada Flagship = Armada Warship
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.terms
Date: 
Mon, 3 Jul 2000 17:56:24 GMT
Viewed: 
5963 times
  
In lugnet.admin.terms, Eric Joslin writes:
In lugnet.admin.terms, Larry Pieniazek writes:

To Eric: One thing I gleaned from your replies to Jude (and I agree with you,
thrash this out, it's good to discuss, even if you happen to be wrong about
the
issue itself :-) ) is that the order that stuff was posted was part of the
problem?

Had it been posted in the other order (to pirates first, then to
marketplace) it would have been OK?

That seems unsupportable. The order posted and the order read have only a • weak
correlation.

Ah... hmmm.

Anyway.  The order certainly set off a flag in my head, and I can honestly say
done the other way 'round I probably wouldn't have even noticed it.

However, I think the correlation between the order posted and the order read:

A) Is pretty strong (a lot of people read Lugnet every day, and even if they
don't, most of the people I know read threaded discussion groups in
chronological order)

but these posts were to different groups. I dunno about you, but my MO is to
start reading a group that interests me from where I left off, till I reach the
end, then dip into another one. Hence, the order posted, if fairly close
together, has zippo to do with the order I read them, since the order I select
groups to read them is based on whim.

and b) is a straw man, because the order people read the
posts in has *absolutely* nothing to with the intention behind those posts.

I think you mean red herring, as you are asserting it is a false clue, rather
than a weakly constructed trial argument that I myself intended to knock down.

You yourself said that "had you seen them in the other order" you might not
have thought as much. You're brighter than most at examining the exact time of
posting, but I've just demonstrated that I, at least, don't really read stuff
in the order posted. I bet lots of other people don't. So it's not a straw man.
Or a red herring either.

You can't infer intention behind why posts were made from what order they were
posted in anyway. I replied to Frank's post before I did yours, what does that
tell you about my intent? :-)

++Lar



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: 2 x Armada Flagship = Armada Warship
 
(...) Ah... hmmm. First, as I tried to hint to you earlier, I don't really think that this post was necessarily nothing but a blatant flog. I did think it raised an interesting point to debate, though, because it would be easy to flog in this manner (...) (24 years ago, 3-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)

27 Messages in This Thread:







Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR