To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.termsOpen lugnet.admin.terms in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / Terms of Use / 126
125  |  127
Subject: 
Re: 2 x Armada Flagship = Armada Warship
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.terms
Date: 
Mon, 3 Jul 2000 18:33:10 GMT
Viewed: 
5957 times
  
Larry Pieniazek wrote in message ...
In lugnet.admin.terms, Frank Filz writes:
Chiding people about breaking rules that aren't

yet (inserted by Lar)

rules is rather poor form.

I forgot about that! EXCELLENT point, Frank. Smacks of vigilantism and of
enforcing mores that aren't actually in effect (which phenomenon I am quite
familiar with, living in Grand Rapids as I do, but I digress).


I like to keep people honest :-)

I sincerely hope that the new TOU get resolved pretty soon. It seems to me that the flaming about perceived rules breaking is
getting worse (over the past couple months, I don't think any discussion of misplaced auction posts has occurred, but there sure has
been a lot about other types of market posts which are currently allowed in any group so long as they relate to that groups purpose
(since the rules currently don't even include a recommendation against such postings).

I also hope that the new rules will make it clear about plugs in sigs, and I'm beginning to feel that blatant market plugs in sigs
should also not be allowed since I can see similar discussion occurring. Of course if the people who would pursue vigilante justice
(thanks for suggesting that word - so far, Todd has not deputized anyone to be cops) would make an effort to understand the rules,
we wouldn't have these flames....

Frank



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: 2 x Armada Flagship = Armada Warship
 
(...) that the flaming about perceived rules breaking is (...) misplaced auction posts has occurred, but there sure has (...) any group so long as they relate to that groups purpose (...) postings). I have not seen too much of this - but I suppose I (...) (24 years ago, 4-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: 2 x Armada Flagship = Armada Warship
 
(...) yet (inserted by Lar) (...) I forgot about that! EXCELLENT point, Frank. Smacks of vigilantism and of enforcing mores that aren't actually in effect (which phenomenon I am quite familiar with, living in Grand Rapids as I do, but I digress). (...) (24 years ago, 3-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)

27 Messages in This Thread:







Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR