To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.suggestionsOpen lugnet.admin.suggestions in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / Suggestions / 1150
1149  |  1151
Subject: 
Re: Language Choices and LUGNET
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.suggestions
Date: 
Tue, 1 Feb 2005 08:45:16 GMT
Viewed: 
5533 times
  
In lugnet.admin.suggestions, Bruce Hietbrink wrote:
   Thinking further on this, I think that another factor, perhaps related, is complexity. I recently posted this little Johnny Carson scene and got 13 spotlights. Now, I’m not so silly as to imagine that this creation, as a creation, holds any sort of candle to many awesome MOCs that got fewer votes. I mean, Kyle’s Agressor got 9 votes. One thing on my creation, though, was that it was extremely simple, and could be fully grokked just from the pic included in my post, while Kyle’s (IMO amazing) ship required you to to through the gallery of pics in detail if you wanted to see it all. So my scene, by having very little to appreciate, could be fully appreciated in a nanosecond, and voted on in about as much time, while Kyle’s work had so much that you couldn’t take it all in at once.

Of course, with that Johnny Carson MOC above also garnered more attention than it perhaps should have because it was a) timely and b) sentimental. I had very similar response when I posted a small memorial MOC for Christopher Reeve, with 7 votes, though not as much with Rodney Dangerfield (2 votes) or Janet Leigh (4 votes). These differences may certainly reflect a greater emotional response to Carson’s and Reeve’s deaths than Dangerfield’s or Leigh’s, rather than any inherent quality of the MOCs themselves. I recall that various 9-11 memorials were spotlighted heavily as well (IMO this by Alan Findlay is the best, BTW).

Simple, timely and sentimental - makes sense to me.

Also, highlights are about the post, not the MOC. One could argue that most of the people who would appreciate Kyle’s MOC (.mecha-meisters and .space-cadets) would have already seen his post since it was appropriately posted to those groups. On the other hand, your post on the Johnny Carson would have been of interest to any American, and they don’t all hang out in .town.

Finally, I don’t think people use highlighting merely as a vote on quality of a MOC - I think they use it simply as an attention seeking device. “Take a look at this everyone”. Highlighting behaviour would be quite different if people thought highlights were votes for MOC of the week.



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Language Choices and LUGNET
 
(...) Good point, but I would expand "people in your LUG" to include people who post heavily in your favorite forums. There are a lot of people (heck, I've never been to a brickfest, so pretty much everyone on Lugnet) that I've never met in person, (...) (19 years ago, 31-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)

38 Messages in This Thread:














Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR