Subject:
|
Re: Language Choices and LUGNET
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.suggestions
|
Date:
|
Thu, 27 Jan 2005 20:29:23 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
4708 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.suggestions, Scott Arthur wrote:
| |
| |
I would like to suggest a “down-light” option. Enough downlights could
moderate a post into oblivion. Then you would truly have a representation
of the “community” opinion on something.
|
You assume that the membership is representative of the community.(?)
|
Yes. You need to put some skin in the game, somewhere. Sure, you could allow
“registered” users to downlight, but personally, I’d leave it to members, people
who care enough to put the smallest of donations in.
Calum
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | community v members v registered users
|
| (...) I'm not saying that all of the community should be allowed to vote. However, I'd like to point out that you are now assuming that only members have donated to LUGNET. I know that is quite wrong; I'm not, and I have. ;) Scott A (19 years ago, 27-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Language Choices and LUGNET
|
| (...) You assume that the membership is representative of the community.(?) (...) You forget that this is the friendliest place on the internet! ;) (...) Hmm. Perhaps Kerry should be "eliminated forever". ;) Scott A (...) (19 years ago, 27-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
38 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
