Subject:
|
Re: Itty-bitty LEGO set looker-upper
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.database
|
Date:
|
Tue, 15 Feb 2000 18:09:38 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
243 times
|
| |
|
|
Todd Lehman wrote:
>
> In lugnet.admin.database, Frank Filz writes:
> > Neat. Though I doubt I'll use it that much (my screen is large enough to
> > have a more full sized browser window open, and I like the larger pictures).
> > [...]
>
> I run a big screen too (1600x1200) but I usually have so many windows open
> doing all different things that screen real estate is still usually pretty
> tight, and most of the time an itty bitty picture or a half- or quarter-
> size picture is all I need to jog my memory about some set... But I know
> what you mean about preferring larger, because it shows more detail and
> doesn't look as blurry as the thumbnails.
At home I run 1600x1200, but don't tend to have too much going on at the
same time. At work, I run 1280x1024, but use the Common Desktop
Environment so I have 6 different virtual screens, Netscape gets one,
work gets another, etc. Really keeps the clutter down. The other
advantage at home with 1600x1200 is that I can afford to have my task
bar visible at all times, and it has room for two rows of buttons, which
makes finding windows on it fairly easy.
--
Frank Filz
-----------------------------
Work: mailto:ffilz@us.ibm.com (business only please)
Home: mailto:ffilz@mindspring.com
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Itty-bitty LEGO set looker-upper
|
| (...) I run a big screen too (1600x1200) but I usually have so many windows open doing all different things that screen real estate is still usually pretty tight, and most of the time an itty bitty picture or a half- or quarter- size picture is all (...) (25 years ago, 15-Feb-00, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
32 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
Active threads in Database
|
|
|
|
|
|
