Subject:
|
Re: August Surprise...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Sun, 15 Jul 2001 23:42:20 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
838 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.trains, Stephen Altbacker writes:
>
> That said, I also think that Mr.. Benecke's trains (MOC's) are much, much
> better than some of these "new" train cars. The caboose is lame, and, I
> mean, who can't whip together a 10013 Open Freight Wagon with a few spare
> parts from his/her own collection???
Assuming, of course, they *have* such parts in their collection!!!
But I agree, the 10013 looks a bit strange - none of the log cars I've seen
(in australia) has big end sections - they rely on the chains holding them.
ROSCO
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: August Surprise...
|
| (...) This car is actully prototypical, the car would normally be used for pulpwood, the logs being short, and stacked sideways. They'll sometimes leave the chain out here stateside... But one thing i have to say, the ends are backwards. The caboose (...) (23 years ago, 16-Jul-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: August Surprise...
|
| So maybe I am "beating a dead horse" with a little "subtle" humor. When you have to explain a joke it is no longer "funny". Explanation to follow (if you "get the joke" please disregard). Start Explanation: I guess I just get a little tired when (...) (23 years ago, 15-Jul-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
66 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
