Subject:
|
Re: Forestmen and Wolfpack... thoughts
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.castle
|
Date:
|
Tue, 28 Mar 2000 21:35:55 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2496 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.castle, Nathan McDowell writes:
> In lugnet.castle, Chris Maddison writes:
> > In lugnet.castle, Nathan McDowell writes:
> > > In lugnet.castle, Chris Maddison writes:
> > > > > If memory serves me right, those were supposed to be Celts. I was not • very
> > > > > happy with their portrayal.
> > > > >
> > > > > Tony
> > > >
> > > > Ahh, Celts! Now it makes sense (light bulb above head) All these years I
> > > > thought they were making fun of Scots, but instead they were just doing a • bad
> > > > portrayal of Celts. Thanks for the clarification.
> > > > -Chris
> > >
> > > Excuse me? You must be joking... Scots *are* Celtic..
> > >
> > > ~Nathan
Yep, you're right. I stand corrected.
-Chris
> >
> > No, no. The Scottish are of Pictish decent, as well as Germanic. The Celts
> > are niether Scottish or Pictish.
>
> > -Chris
>
> If you are interested in the history of these peoples go to <A
> HREF="http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/DavidDale1/Hisco.htm">The
> History of the Scots, Picts, and Britons by David F. Dale</A>
>
> ~Nathan
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
40 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
