To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.castleOpen lugnet.castle in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Castle / 3821
3820  |  3822
Subject: 
Re: Forestmen and Wolfpack... thoughts
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.castle
Date: 
Tue, 28 Mar 2000 20:11:41 GMT
Viewed: 
2366 times
  
In lugnet.castle, Nathan McDowell writes:
In lugnet.castle, Chris Maddison writes:
If memory serves me right, those were supposed to be Celts.  I was not very
happy with their portrayal.

Tony

Ahh, Celts!  Now it makes sense (light bulb above head)  All these years I
thought they were making fun of Scots, but instead they were just doing a bad
portrayal of Celts.  Thanks for the clarification.
-Chris

Excuse me?  You must be joking... Scots *are* Celtic..

~Nathan

No, no.  The Scottish are of Pictish decent, as well as Germanic.  The Celts
are niether Scottish or Pictish.
-Chris



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Forestmen and Wolfpack... thoughts
 
(...) bad (...) If you are interested in the history of these peoples go to <A HREF="(URL)The History of the Scots, Picts, and Britons by David F. Dale</A> ~Nathan (24 years ago, 28-Mar-00, to lugnet.castle)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Forestmen and Wolfpack... thoughts
 
(...) Excuse me? You must be joking... Scots *are* Celtic.. ~Nathan (24 years ago, 28-Mar-00, to lugnet.castle)

40 Messages in This Thread:














Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR