Subject:
|
Re: In dev: new ldconfig.ldr file
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Mon, 9 Aug 2004 20:03:52 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2762 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Don Heyse wrote:
> [LDraw.Configurations]
Isn't "LDraw." redundant? It is, after all, the ldraw.ini file.
--Travis Cobbs
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: In dev: new ldconfig.ldr file
|
| (...) Maybe so, but I still like it. :^) Besides, it's really all about backwards compatibility. You're not suggesting we rename the [LDraw] key to [] are you? After all, it's just as redundant. Perhaps I'm a dummy, but I've got all sorts of LDAO (...) (20 years ago, 9-Aug-04, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: In dev: new ldconfig.ldr file
|
| (...) Ah ha! I thought I saw some duplicates in there. Then the only thing left in [LDraw] is the various paths to find things. I like that. (...) Ok, so how about this? [LDraw.Configurations] # FILE Config Name LOCALE 0=ldconfig.ldr default EN (...) (20 years ago, 9-Aug-04, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
33 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
