Subject:
|
Re: In dev: new ldconfig.ldr file
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Tue, 10 Aug 2004 00:14:45 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2506 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Tore Eriksson wrote:
> The more I think about it, the more I lean towards ldconfig.ldr should
> stick to handle just 'color definitions' and just default border colors,
> rather than 'color configurations'. Where 'default' is the traditional
> "anti-color" that optionally can be overruled by user's preferences. Isn't
> it better if 'color configurations' were kept in ldraw.ini, alternatively
> in the different programs' ini files respectively?
I agree that ldconfig.ldr should stay simple.
But it should be possible for people to create and use alternate configuration
files, including (but not limited to) alternate color definitions.
Let's see, that's 4, or maybe 5, votes for 'traditional' edge colors.
Steve
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: In dev: new ldconfig.ldr file
|
| (...) The more I think about it, the more I lean towards ldconfig.ldr should stick to handle just 'color definitions' and just default border colors, rather than 'color configurations'. Where 'default' is the traditional "anti-color" that optionally (...) (20 years ago, 9-Aug-04, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
33 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
