Subject:
|
Re: New Press Release about Power Function Trains
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Fri, 28 Mar 2008 05:09:15 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
10355 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.trains, David Stannard wrote:
> Given the size of the battery box 6 wide hood units will be a thing of the
> past, would it be possible to have a 4 stud wide footprint on the bottom and the
> have the rest of the side recessed similar to the headlight brick
> configuration.This will give the ability to build 6 wide hood units by providing
> a 4 x 8 plate sized studded surface on the battery box side, the ability to use
> plates, mod plates,tiles and mod tiles, gives great potential to model doors,
> grills, handrails etc. The majority of AFOL train builders use SNOT techniques
> as basic construction, having this feature would serve as a great selling point
> and a more adaptable model to the AFOL market.
Excellent idea, even if it means extending the battery by another two+ studs
lengthwise. Another permutation to consider would be instead of recessing a half
plate on each side, to make it a full plate thinner on both sides so that any
surface tile work would be flush with adjacent bricks. Might need a half or full
plate thickness on the bottom for a transition, but I would think most AFOLs
could live with that (still though, make it black).
Benn
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: New Press Release about Power Function Trains
|
| (...) past, would it be possible to have a 4 stud wide footprint on the bottom and the have the rest of the side recessed similar to the headlight brick configuration.This will give the ability to build 6 wide hood units by providing a 4 x 8 plate (...) (16 years ago, 28-Mar-08, to lugnet.trains)
|
37 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
